Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:155-160
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O.
Right arrow Articles by Miyagishima, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O.
Right arrow Articles by Miyagishima, R.

A potential clinical method for calculating transmural left ventricular filling pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation: an intraoperative study in humans

OA Smiseth, CR Thompson, H Ling, M Robinson, and RT Miyagishima

Division of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to investigate whether right atrial pressure could be used to estimate pericardial pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). BACKGROUND. Because of elevated intrathoracic pressure during PEEP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure may not accurately reflect left ventricular preload. An estimate of pericardial pressure during PEEP would allow assessment of transmural filling pressure. METHODS. In eight patients, at the start of cardiac surgery, pericardial and pleural pressures were recorded by balloon transducers placed over the anterolateral left ventricular wall. We also recorded intravascular pressures and left ventricular short-axis area by transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS. A stepwise increase in PEEP from 0 to 15 cm H2O caused a linear increase in pleural pressure from 0.3 +/- 0.6 (mean +/- SEM) to 6.1 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (p < 0.01). Pericardial pressure increased from 2.3 +/- 0.5 to 5.9 +/- 0.6 mm Hg (p < 0.01). The correlation between right atrial (Pra) and pericardial pressure (Pperic) was good: Pra = 0.85 x Pperic + 1.8, r = 0.77. The correlation between changes in right atrial pressure and in pericardial pressure was better: delta Pra = 0.96 x delta Pperic -0.2, r = 0.97. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased with PEEP (p < 0.05), whereas left ventricular area decreased (p < 0.05). However, there was a progressive reduction in transmural pressure, calculated as wedge pressure minus pericardial pressure (p < 0.05), and in transmural pressure, estimated as wedge pressure minus right atrial pressure (p < 0.05). The estimated transmural filling pressure correlated (r = 0.86) with end-diastolic area. CONCLUSIONS. The present observations suggest that right atrial pressure may be used to estimate changes in pericardial pressure with PEEP and that pulmonary capillary wedge pressure minus right atrial pressure is a potentially clinically useful approximation of transmural filling pressure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. F. Haney, G. Johansson, S. Haggmark, B. Biber, M. F. Haney, G. Johansson, S. Haggmark, and B. Biber
Myocardial Systolic Function Increases During Positive Pressure Lung Inflation
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1269 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. D. Moore, M. P. Frenneaux, R. Sas, J. J. Atherton, J. A. Morris-Thurgood, E. R. Smith, J. V. Tyberg, and I. Belenkie
Ventricular interaction and external constraint account for decreased stroke work during volume loading in CHF
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2385 - H2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement