JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:115-123
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A
Right arrow Articles by Antony, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A
Right arrow Articles by Antony, I

Epicardial coronary arteries are not adequately sized in hypertensive patients

A Nitenberg and I Antony

Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hopital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to compare coronary artery dimensions in hypertensive patients and normal subjects. BACKGROUND. Myocardial oxygen demand at rest and corresponding coronary blood flow are the main determinants of large coronary artery dimensions in humans. Coronary diameters are increased in aortic valve disease. METHODS. Left main, proximal and distal left anterior descending and proximal circumflex coronary artery diameters were measured by quantitative angiography in 10 control subjects (group 1) and 26 untreated hypertensive patients, 12 without (group 2a) and 14 with (group 2b) left ventricular hypertrophy. All patients had normal cholesterol levels and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Measurements were made at baseline and after 2 mg of intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate to obtain maximal dimensions of vessels. Coronary flow velocity was measured in the distal left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS. Despite a higher rate-pressure product in hypertensive patients, all segment diameters were slightly but not significantly higher at baseline in group 2b than in groups 1 and 2a. Diameters were similar in the three groups after isosorbide dinitrate. Conversely, coronary flow velocity was significantly higher in hypertensive patients than in group 1 either at baseline (10.4 +/- 2.2 [mean +/- SD] cm/s [group 2a] and 12.8 +/- 2.4 cm/s [group 2b] vs. 6.5 +/- 2.0 cm/s [group 1], all p < 0.001) or after isosorbide dinitrate (6.8 +/- 2.8 cm/s [group 2a] and 7.8 +/- 2.1 cm/s [group 2b] vs. 3.7 +/- 0.8 cm/s [group 1], p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS. Despite an elevated myocardial oxygen demand, maximal dimensions of large coronary arteries are not increased in hypertensive patients, resulting in an elevated coronary flow velocity that may increase longitudinal shear stress at the endothelial surface. This elevated flow velocity might be an important determinant in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Indermuhle, R. Vogel, P. Meier, S. Wirth, R. Stoop, M. G. Mohaupt, and C. Seiler
The relative myocardial blood volume differentiates between hypertensive heart disease and athlete's heart in humans
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1571 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Zindrou, K. M. Taylor, and J. P. Bagger
Coronary artery size and disease in UK South Asian and Caucasian men.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 492 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. Agabiti-Rosei, M. L. Muiesan, and M. Salvetti
Evaluation of Subclinical Target Organ Damage for Risk Assessment and Treatment in the Hypertensive Patients: Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4_suppl_2): S104 - S108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. Wieneke, K. Sattler, C. von Birgelen, D. Bose, M. Haude, W. Rechenberg, S. Sack, N. Dagres, and R. Erbel
Impact of intraventricular conduction delay on coronary haemodynamics: a study with intracoronary Doppler in patients with bundle branch blocks and normal coronary arteries.
Europace, March 1, 2006; 8(3): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D J R Hildick-Smith and L M Shapiro
Echocardiographic differentiation of pathological and physiological left ventricular hypertrophy
Heart, June 1, 2001; 85(6): 615 - 619.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. J. R. Hildick-Smith and L. M. Shapiro
Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1889 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.Y.H Lip, D.C Felmeden, F.L Li-Saw-Hee, and D.G Beevers
Hypertensive heart disease. A complex syndrome or a hypertensive 'cardiomyopathy'?
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2000; 21(20): 1653 - 1665.
[PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
H. C. McGill Jr, C. A. McMahan, R. E. Tracy, M. C. Oalmann, J. F. Cornhill, E. E. Herderick, and J. P. Strong
Relation of a Postmortem Renal Index of Hypertension to Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Size in Young Men and Women
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 1998; 18(7): 1108 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. Nunez, K. Hosoya, D. Susic, and E. D. Frohlich
Enalapril and Losartan Reduced Cardiac Mass and Improved Coronary Hemodynamics in SHR
Hypertension, January 1, 1997; 29(1): 519 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. P. Burke, A. Farb, Y.-h. Liang, J. Smialek, and R. Virmani
Effect of Hypertension and Cardiac Hypertrophy on Coronary Artery Morphology in Sudden Cardiac Death
Circulation, December 15, 1996; 94(12): 3138 - 3145.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.