Left ventricular beat-to-beat performance in atrial fibrillation: contribution of Frank-Starling mechanism after short rather than long RR intervals

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate control mechanism of the varying left ventricular performance in atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is characterized by a randomly irregular ventricular response, resulting in continuous variation in left ventricular beat-to-beat mechanical behavior and hemodynamic variables. METHODS: Fourteen patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were studied, using a nonimaging computerized nuclear probe linked to a personal computer. Left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volume counts, stroke volume counts and filling time were calculated on a beat-to-beat basis during 500 consecutive RR intervals. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess how ejection fraction was predicted by these variables. RESULTS: The preceding RR interval and end-diastolic volume showed a positive relation, and prepreceding interval and end-systolic volume an inverse relation, with ejection fraction (all p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the preceding interval and the end-diastolic volume were equally important in predicting ejection fraction. There was a relatively strong interaction between the preceding interval and end-diastolic volume, indicating that the influence of the end-diastolic volume on ejection fraction was diminished after long intervals. A second interaction showed that the effect of end-diastolic volume on ejection fraction was attenuated after short prepreceding cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Cycle length-dependent contractile mechanisms, including postextrasystolic potentiation and mechanical restitution, determine the varying left ventricular systolic performance during atrial fibrillation over the entire range of intervals. Beat-to-beat changes in preload, consistent with the Frank-Starling mechanism, also play a role, but their influence is diminished after long preceding and short prepreceding intervals.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Brignole, M. Gammage, E. Puggioni, P. Alboni, A. Raviele, R. Sutton, P. Vardas, M.G. Bongiorni, L. Bergfeldt, C. Menozzi, et al. Comparative assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 712 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Melenovsky, I. Hay, B. J. Fetics, B. A. Borlaug, A. Kramer, J. M. Pastore, R. Berger, and D. A. Kass Functional impact of rate irregularity in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 705 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Puggioni, M. Brignole, M. Gammage, E. Soldati, M. G. Bongiorni, E. N. Simantirakis, P. Vardas, F. Gadler, L. Bergfeldt, C. Tomasi, et al. Acute comparative effect of right and left ventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 234 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tabata, R. A. Grimm, J. Asada, Z. B. Popovic, H. Yamada, N. L. Greenberg, D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, et al. Determinants of LV diastolic function during atrial fibrillation: beat-to-beat analysis in acute dog experiments Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H145 - H152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pinter, P. Dorian, M. Paquette, A. Ng, M. Burns, I. Spanu, M. Freeman, V. Korley, and D. Newman Left Ventricular Performance During Acute Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: The Importance of Heart Rate and Agent Used Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. B. Popovic', K. A. Mowrey, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, R. A. Grimm, J. D. Thomas, and T. N. Mazgalev Slow rate during AF improves ventricular performance by reducing sensitivity to cycle length irregularity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2706 - H2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Takagaki, P M McCarthy, M Chung, J Connor, R Dessoffy, Y Ochiai, M Howard, K Doi, M Kopcak, T N Mazgalev, et al. Preload-adjusted maximal power: a novel index of left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 170 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tabata, R. A. Grimm, N. L. Greenberg, D. A. Agler, K. A. Mowrey, D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, T. N. Mazgalev, and J. D. Thomas Assessment of LV systolic function in atrial fibrillation using an index of preceding cardiac cycles Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H573 - H580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M I M NOBLE Beat to beat left ventricular performance in spontaneous atrial fibrillation does not depend on afterload Heart, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 89 - 89. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Nakazawa, D.A Lythall, J Noh, N Ishikawa, K Sugino, K Ito, and S.M.C Hardman Is there a place for the late cardioversion of atrial fibrillation?. A long-term follow-up study of patients with post-thyrotoxic atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2000; 21(4): 327 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H J Muntinga, A T M Gosselink, P K Blanksma, P J De Kam, E E V. D. Wall, and H J G M Crijns Left ventricular beat to beat performance in atrial fibrillation: dependence on contractility, preload, and afterload Heart, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 575 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. I. O. Brookes, P. A. White, M. Staples, P. J. Oldershaw, A. N. Redington, P. D. Collins, and M. I. M. Noble Myocardial Contractility Is Not Constant During Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Circulation, October 27, 1998; 98(17): 1762 - 1768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M.C Hardman, M. I.M Noble, T. Biggs, and W.A. Seed Evidence for an influence of mechanical restitution on beat-to-beat variations in haemodynamics during chronic atrial fibrillation in patients Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1998; 38(1): 82 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Kim, V. Sompalli, A. Rameneni, M. K. Gadde, M. Pamidi, R. Pathapati, K. J. Ferrick, J. Gross, U. Ben-Zur, S. Furman, et al. Symptomatic Improvement After AV Nodal Ablation and Pacemaker Implantation for Refractory Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter Angiology, November 1, 1997; 48(11): 933 - 938. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, K. A. Mowrey, S. Zhuang, D. W. Wallick, Z. B. Popovic, and T. N. Mazgalev Optimal ventricular rate slowing during atrial fibrillation by feedback AV nodal-selective vagal stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1102 - H1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]