JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 26:1187-1195
© 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Severi, S
Right arrow Articles by Camici, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Severi, S
Right arrow Articles by Camici, P.

Dobutamine stress: effects on regional myocardial blood flow and wall motion

S Severi, R Underwood, RH Mohiaddin, H Boyd, M Paterni, and PG Camici

CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, University of Pisa, Italy.

OBJECTIVES. This investigation studied the relation between regional myocardial blood flow and left ventricular function during dobutamine stress in patients with coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND. Dobutamine stress is becoming more frequently used as an alternative to dynamic exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease. METHODS. We studied 12 patients with coronary artery disease. Dobutamine was infused from 5 micrograms/kg body weight per min up to 40 micrograms/kg per min or until chest pain or other intolerable side effects. Regional myocardial blood flow was measured with positron emission tomography and oxygen-15-labeled water. Regional wall motion was assessed in three short-axis slices by magnetic resonance imaging. Each slice was subdivided into four regions: septal, anterior, lateral and inferior. A total of 140 regions were suitable for comparison. RESULTS. During stress, new wall motion abnormalities developed in 27 regions. Myocardial blood flow (mean +/- SD) increased in 113 regions that did not develop wall motion abnormalities (0.98 +/- 0.26 [baseline] vs. 1.98 +/- 0.87 [dobutamine] ml/min per g, p < 0.001), whereas it did not change significantly in regions with stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (1.00 +/- 0.28 [baseline] vs. 1.30 +/- 0.62 [dobutamine] ml/min per g, p = NS). An absolute decrease in myocardial blood flow below the value at rest was observed in seven segments that developed wall motion abnormalities during stress. CONCLUSIONS. The normal functional response to dobutamine stress is paralleled by an increase in coronary flow, whereas mechanical dysfunction is accompanied by a blunted increase, or even a paradoxic decrease, in regional coronary flow.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
R Jagathesan, E Barnes, S D Rosen, R Foale, and P G Camici
Dobutamine-induced hyperaemia inversely correlates with coronary artery stenosis severity and highlights dissociation between myocardial blood flow and oxygen consumption
Heart, September 1, 2006; 92(9): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. Jagathesan, P. A. Kaufmann, S. D. Rosen, O. E. Rimoldi, F. Turkeimer, R. Foale, and P. G. Camici
Assessment of the Long-Term Reproducibility of Baseline and Dobutamine-Induced Myocardial Blood Flow in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Yip, B. Khandheria, M. Belohlavek, C. Pislaru, J. Seward, K. Bailey, A. J. Tajik, P. Pellikka, and T. Abraham
Strain echocardiography tracks dobutamine-induced decrease in regional myocardial perfusion in nonocclusive coronary stenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1664 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Ruiz, K. Takehana, F. D. Petruzella, D. D. Watson, G. A. Beller, and D. K. Glover
Arbutamine Stress Perfusion Imaging in Dogs with Critical Coronary Artery Stenoses: 99mTc-Sestamibi Versus 201Tl
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 664 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
R. Scognamiglio, A. Avogaro, S. Vigili de Kreutzenberg, C. Negut, M. Palisi, E. Bagolin, and A. Tiengo
Effects of Treatment With Sulfonylurea Drugs or Insulin on Ischemia-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, March 1, 2002; 51(3): 808 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Barnes, R. J. C. Hall, D. P. Dutka, and P. G. Camici
Absolute blood flow and oxygenconsumption in stunned myocardiumin patients with coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2002; 39(3): 420 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Lafitte, H. Matsugata, B. Peters, M. Togni, M. Strachan, O. L. Kwan, and A. N. DeMaria
Comparative Value of Dobutamine and Adenosine Stress in the Detection of Coronary Stenosis With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography
Circulation, June 5, 2001; 103(22): 2724 - 2730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
O. O. Akinboboye, O. Idris, R.-L. Chou, R. R. Sciacca, P. J. Cannon, and S. R. Bergmann
Absolute quantitation of coronary steal induced by intravenous dipyridamole
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Tadamura, H. Iida, K. Matsumoto, M. Mamede, S. Kubo, H. Toyoda, T. Shiozaki, T. Mukai, Y. Magata, and J. Konishi
Comparison of myocardial blood flow during dobutamine-atropine infusion with that after dipyridamole administration in normal men
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 130 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O. Rimoldi, S. M. Burns, S. D. Rosen, T. E. Wistow, P. M. Schofield, G. Taylor, and P. G. Camici
Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow With Positron Emission Tomography Before and After Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-134 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. A. Schneider, E. Voth, D. Moka, F. M. Baer, J. Melin, A. Bol, R. Wagner, H. Schicha, E. Erdmann, and U. Sechtem
Improvement of myocardial blood flow to ischemic regions by angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition with quinaprilat IV: A study using [15O] water dobutamine stress positron emission tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1005 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Bartunek, W. Wijns, G. R. Heyndrickx, and B. de Bruyne
Effects of Dobutamine on Coronary Stenosis Physiology and Morphology : Comparison With Intracoronary Adenosine
Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. Wijns, S. F. Vatner, and P. G. Camici
Hibernating Myocardium
N. Engl. J. Med., July 16, 1998; 339(3): 173 - 181.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. A. Skopicki, S. A. Abraham, M. H. Picard, N. M. Alpert, A. J. Fischman, and H. Gewirtz
Effects of Dobutamine at Maximally Tolerated Dose on Myocardial Blood Flow in Humans With Ischemic Heart Disease
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3346 - 3352.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. H. Lee, V. G. Davila-Roman, P. A. Ludbrook, M. Courtois, J. F. Walsh, D. A. Delano, P. J. Rubin, and R. J. Gropler
Dependency of Contractile Reserve on Myocardial Blood Flow : Implications for the Assessment of Myocardial Viability With Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2884 - 2891.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Calnon, D. K. Glover, G. A. Beller, G. Vanzetto, W. H. Smith, D. D. Watson, and M. Ruiz
Effects of Dobutamine Stress on Myocardial Blood Flow, 99mTc Sestamibi Uptake, and Systolic Wall Thickening in the Presence of Coronary Artery Stenoses : Implications for Dobutamine Stress Testing
Circulation, October 7, 1997; 96(7): 2353 - 2360.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.