JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 26:1140-1145
© 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, R
Right arrow Articles by Dymond, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lim, R
Right arrow Articles by Dymond, D.

Objective assessment of "cardioprotective" efficacy as a prognostic guide to management of mildly symptomatic revascularizable coronary artery disease

R Lim, L Dyke, and DS Dymond

Department of Cardiology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, England, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES. The concept of "cardioprotection" based on ejection fraction was tested to see whether patients with coronary artery disease in whom medical treatment fails to be cardioprotective can be distinguished from those in whom it is safe to continue such treatment. BACKGROUND. Ejection fraction is of fundamental prognostic importance. Its modification by anti-ischemic medication may allow assessment of cardioprotection from adverse outcome. METHODS. Exercise ejection fraction and the change in ejection fraction from rest to exercise were measured by radionuclide ventriculography with and without background medication in 102 mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease suitable for revascularization but initially treated medically. RESULTS. Over 20 months, 23 patients experienced an adverse event. With medication, exercise ejection fraction increased in patients with and without events. By contrast, the ejection fraction response to exercise improved significantly in the event-free group only; the group with events had a persistent decrease in ejection fraction. By Cox analysis, the ejection fraction response to exercise performed with medication made the most significant independent contribution to event-free survival. Comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves suggested that this index is the most useful clinical measure of cardioprotection. CONCLUSIONS. An exercise-induced decrease in ejection fraction despite anti-ischemic medication implies failure of cardioprotection and a greater short-term risk of adverse outcome and crossover to revascularization in patients initially treated medically. Conversely, a preserved left ventricular performance confers a satisfactory prognosis while continuing with that treatment. Thus, the effect of medication on the ejection fraction response to exercise--a reasonable estimate of its cardioprotective efficacy--may influence the choice of continuing with such treatment or performing early revascularization.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.