Intraoperative validation of mitral inflow determination by transesophageal echocardiography: comparison of single-plane, biplane and thermodilution techniques

Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195-5064, USA.

OBJECTIVES. This study investigated the accuracy of mitral inflow quantification using biplane transesophageal echocardiography. BACKGROUND. Mitral stroke volume can be reliably quantified by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, but previous studies involving monoplane transesophageal echocardiography have yielded mixed results. METHODS. Thirty patients without mitral regurgitation were prospectively examined immediately before cardiovascular surgery. Mitral annulus diameter was measured in the transverse (d1) and longitudinal views (d2) by biplane transesophageal echocardiography. Assuming an elliptic shape, the annular area was calculated as pi d1d2/4; area was also calculated from single-plane data assuming a circular annular shape as pi d2/4. The time-velocity integral of mitral annular Doppler velocity was then multiplied by annular area to yield stroke volume. These data were compared with simultaneous thermodilution measurements by linear regression. RESULTS. Good correlations were observed between thermodilution (x) and Doppler (y) measurements of stroke volume (SV) (r = 0.86, p < 0.01, delta SV [y-x] = 2.64 +/- 9.86 ml for single four-chamber view; r = 0.77, p < 0.01, delta SV = 1.82 +/- 12.59 ml for two-chamber view; r = 0.94, p < 0.001, delta SV = 1.78 +/- 5.90 ml for biplane measurements) with similar data for cardiac output (r = 0.82, r = 0.74 and r = 0.92, respectively). The biplane measurements were most accurate and had less variability in individual patients (p < 0.05). This finding was supported by a numerical model that demonstrated (for an ellipse of eccentricity 1.5:1) that even maximal misalignment of biplane diameters yielded only 8% area overestimation, whereas single-plane calculations assuming a circular shape produced a variation in area of 225%. CONCLUSIONS. This study validates the accuracy of measurements of mitral inflow using biplane transesophageal echocardiography with potential application for quantification of valvular regurgitation in the operating room. The results are further generalizable, indicating that orthogonal biplane measurements are both necessary and sufficient to ensure accuracy in area calculation for any elliptic structure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Hyodo, S. Iwata, A. Tugcu, Y. Oe, A. Koczo, K. Shimada, T. Muro, J. Yoshikawa, M. Yoshiyama, L. D. Gillam, et al. Accurate measurement of mitral annular area by using single and biplane linear measurements: comparison of conventional methods with the three-dimensional planimetric method Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, December 30, 2011; (2011) jer300v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Mahmood, B. Subramaniam, J. H. Gorman III, R. M. Levine, R. C. Gorman, A. Maslow, P. J. Panzica, R. M. Hagberg, S. Karthik, and K. R. Khabbaz Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Assessment of Changes in Mitral Valve Geometry After Valve Repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 88(6): 1838 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Thomas and Z. B. Popovic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Cardiac Ultrasound J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2012 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sadik, B. Rundqvist, N. Selimovic, and O. Bech-Hanssen Improved stroke volume assessment in the aortic and mitral valves with a new method in subjects without regurgitation Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 210 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Dennig, H J Nesser, D Hall, H U Haase, and A Schomig Determination of prestenotic flow volume using an automated method based on colour Doppler imaging for evaluating orifice area by the continuity equation: validation in a pulsatile flow model Heart, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. A. Ambrose and M. Weinrauch Thrombosis in Ischemic Heart Disease Arch Intern Med, July 8, 1996; 156(13): 1382 - 1394. [Abstract] [PDF]