Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 26:416-421
© 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chester, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chester, M

Rapid angiographic progression of "target" and "nontarget" stenoses in patients awaiting coronary angioplasty

JC Kaski, L Chen, and M Chester

Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, England, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES. Our aim was to compare the short-term evolution of "target" versus "nontarget" stenoses in patients awaiting coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND. Coronary angioplasty is effective therapy for angina pectoris, but coronary events occur after successful angioplasty that are caused by both restenosis and progression of mild preexisting nontarget stenoses. METHODS. We prospectively studied 161 consecutive patients with stable angina (124 men and 37 women). After diagnostic angiography, target stenoses for angioplasty and nontarget lesions were identified. Patients were put on a routine waiting list and followed up regularly until repeat coronary arteriography was performed (mean +/- SD 7 +/- 3 months), either immediately before angioplasty (138 patients) or soon after an acute coronary event (23 patients), if one occurred. Stenosis diameter was measured by using computerized arteriography. Progression of disease was defined as > or = 20% lesion diameter reduction, new total occlusion or development of a "new" stenosis > or = 30%. RESULTS. At study entry, the mean diameter of target (n = 207) and nontarget (n = 184) lesions was 68 +/- 9% and 38 +/- 9%, respectively (p < 0.001). Disease progression occurred in 33 patients (20%). Seven new lesions (one total occlusion) developed. Eighteen target (9%) and 15 nontarget (8%) stenoses progressed. The power of the study to detect a difference of 1% between the risks of progression of target and nontarget stenoses with a 90% probability was < 0.1. Total occlusion developed in 15 (83%) of the 18 target and 6 (40%) of the 15 nontarget stenoses (p = 0.03). During follow-up, a myocardial infarction developed in 3 patients (2%) and unstable angina in 20 (12%). These coronary events were associated with progression of target stenoses in 10 patients and nontarget stenoses in 7 and with the development of new lesions in 1. In five patients coronary events were not associated with stenosis progression. CONCLUSIONS. Despite differences in baseline severity, a similar proportion of target and nontarget lesions progressed rapidly. However, target stenoses were more likely than nontarget lesions to progress to total occlusion. Progression of nontarget stenoses may contribute to recurrence of angina and new coronary events after successful angioplasty and should be considered when developing strategies aimed at improving outcome after angioplasty.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S Talwar, M Karpha, R Thomas, C Vurwerk, I C Cox, C J Burrell, J G Motwani, T J Gilbert, and G A Haywood
Disease progression and adverse events in patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention
Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2005; 81(957): 459 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Zouridakis, P. Avanzas, R. Arroyo-Espliguero, S. Fredericks, and J. C. Kaski
Markers of Inflammation and Rapid Coronary Artery Disease Progression in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris
Circulation, September 28, 2004; 110(13): 1747 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P Avanzas, R Arroyo-Espliguero, J Cosin-Sales, G Aldama, C Pizzi, J Quiles, and J C Kaski
Markers of inflammation and multiple complex stenoses (pancoronary plaque vulnerability) in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 847 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E.G. Zouridakis, R. Schwartzman, X. Garcia-Moll, I.D. Cox, S. Fredericks, D.W. Holt, and J.C. Kaski
Increased plasma endothelin levels in angina patients with rapid coronary artery disease progression
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2001; 22(17): 1578 - 1584.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
X. Garcia-Moll, F. Coccolo, D. Cole, and J. C. Kaski
Serum neopterin and complex stenosis morphology in patients with unstable angina
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2000; 35(4): 956 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement