|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 26:401-406 © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Northwest Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center, WA, USA.
OBJECTIVES. This study sought to compare the use of invasive procedures and length of stay for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to health maintenance organization (HMO) and fee-for-service hospitals. BACKGROUND. The HMOs have reduced costs compared with fee-for-service systems by reducing discretionary admissions and decreasing hospital length of stay. It has not been established whether staff-model HMO hospitals also reduce the rate of procedure utilization. METHODS. Using data from a retrospective cohort, we performed univariate and multivariate comparisons of the use of cardiac procedures, length of stay and hospital mortality in 998 patients admitted to two staff-model HMO hospitals and 7,036 patients admitted to 13 fee-for-service hospitals between January 1988 and December 1992. RESULTS. The odds of undergoing coronary angiography were 1.5 times as great for patients admitted to fee-for-service hospitals than for those admitted to HMO hospitals (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 1.9). Similarly, the odds of undergoing coronary revascularization were two times greater in fee-for-service hospitals (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.5). However, higher utilization was strongly associated with the greater availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities in fee-for-service hospitals. The length of hospital stay, by contrast, was approximately 1 day shorter in the fee-for-service cohort (7.3 vs. 8.0 days, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. Physicians in staff-model HMO hospitals use fewer invasive procedures and longer lengths of stay to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction than physicians in fee-for-service hospitals. This finding, however, appears to be associated with the lack of on-site catheterization facilities at HMO hospitals.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. D. Sanders, M. A. Hlatky, and D. K. Owens Cost-Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators N. Engl. J. Med., October 6, 2005; 353(14): 1471 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Alter, C. D. Naylor, P. C. Austin, B. T.B. Chan, and J. V. Tu Geography and service supply do not explain socioeconomic gradients in angiography use after acute myocardial infarction Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 4, 2003; 168(3): 261 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. McNeil Hidden Barriers to Improvement in the Quality of Care N. Engl. J. Med., November 29, 2001; 345(22): 1612 - 1620. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Guadagnoli, M. B. Landrum, E. A. Peterson, M. T. Gahart, T. J. Ryan, and B. J. McNeil Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography after Myocardial Infarction among Medicare Beneficiaries -- Managed Care versus Fee for Service N. Engl. J. Med., November 16, 2000; 343(20): 1460 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Canto, W. J. Rogers, W. J. French, J. M. Gore, N. C. Chandra, H. V. Barron, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Payer Status and the Utilization of Hospital Resources in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Arch Intern Med, March 27, 2000; 160(6): 817 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. F. Riley, A. L. Potosky, C. N. Klabunde, J. L. Warren, and R. Ballard-Barbash Stage at Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns Among Older Women With Breast Cancer: An HMO and Fee-for-Service Comparison JAMA, February 24, 1999; 281(8): 720 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. R. Every, C. P. Cannon, C. Granger, D. J. Moliterno, F. V. Aguirre, J. D. Talley, J. Booth, S. Sapp, J. J. Ferguson, and for the GUARANTEE investigators Influence of insurance type on the use of procedures, medications and hospital outcome in patients with unstable angina: results from the GUARANTEE registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 387 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Lee, F. Fath-Ordoubadi, K. J. Beatt, N. R. Every, and W. D. Weaver A Comparison of Thrombolytic Therapy with Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 1997; 336(15): 1103 - 1104. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Acute MI Care: HMO vs. Fee-for-Service Hospitals Journal Watch Cardiology, October 1, 1995; 1995(1001): 17 - 17. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 ACUTE MI CARE: HMO vs. FEE-FOR-SERVICE HOSPITALS Journal Watch (General), August 8, 1995; 1995(808): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
