Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 26:365-373
© 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tebbe, U
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tebbe, U
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, G

Thrombolysis with recombinant unglycosylated single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (saruplase) in acute myocardial infarction: influence of heparin on early patency rate (LIMITS study). Liquemin in Myocardial Infarction During Thrombolysis With Saruplase

U Tebbe, J Windeler, I Boesl, H Hoffmann, J Wojcik, M Ashmawy, E Rudiger Schwarz, P von Loewis, P Rosemeyer, G Hopkins, et al.

Gruenenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.

OBJECTIVES. The Liquemin in Myocardial Infarction During Thrombolysis With Saruplase (LIMITS) study was instituted to evaluate and characterize the effect of a prethrombolytic heparin bolus (5,000 IU) on the efficacy and safety of saruplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND. Heparin has been used after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction to prevent reocclusion of the infarct-related artery. METHODS. The study was designed as a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, multicenter trial. Patients were treated within 6 h of onset of symptoms with either a bolus of 5,000 IU of heparin (Liquemin) (n = 56, HSH group) or placebo (n = 62, PSH group) before thrombolytic treatment with saruplase given as a 20-mg bolus followed by an infusion of 60 mg over 60 min. Thirty minutes after completion of thrombolysis, an intravenous heparin infusion was administered for 5 days. Before coronary angiography was performed at 6 to 12 h after start of lysis, an additional bolus of 5,000 IU heparin was given to all patients. End points studied were patency of the infarct-related artery, changes in the hemostatic system and bleeding complications. RESULTS. In the HSH group (heparin-saruplase-heparin), 78.6% of patients had an open infarct-related vessel (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 2 or 3) compared with 56.5% in the PSH group (placebo-saruplase-heparin) (intention-to-treat analysis, p = 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to changes in fibrinogen and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products. A total of eight bleeding complications (14.3%) were observed in the HSH group and five (8.1%) in the PSH group; no cerebrovascular event occurred, and no allergic reaction was reported. A total of 12 patients died during the hospital stay, 3 in the HSH group (5.4%) and 9 in the PSH group (14.5%). CONCLUSIONS. In acute myocardial infarction, the administration of a heparin bolus before thrombolytic therapy with saruplase is associated with a significantly higher patency at angiography 6 to 12 h after the start of thrombolysis without any appreciable increase in risk of bleeding.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Eikelboom, D. J. Quinlan, S. R. Mehta, A. G. Turpie, I. B. Menown, and S. Yusuf
Unfractionated and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Adjuncts to Thrombolysis in Aspirin-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials
Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3855 - 3867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Furlan, R. Higashida, L. Wechsler, M. Gent, H. Rowley, C. Kase, M. Pessin, A. Ahuja, F. Callahan, W. M. Clark, et al.
Intra-arterial Prourokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The PROACT II Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, December 1, 1999; 282(21): 2003 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. Gurewich, G. J. del Zoppo, R. T. Higashida, A. J. Furlan, H. A. Rowley, and M. Gent
Intra-arterial Pro-urokinase in Ischemic Stroke Response
Stroke, June 1, 1998; 29(6): 1255 - 1256.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement