Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: effect of discontinuing latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance and exercise capacity

Service de Cardiologie, Hopital A. Pare, Boulogne, France.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to assess the short-term effect of discontinuing latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance and exercise tolerance in patients with improved functional status by cardiomyoplasty, in whom latissimus dorsi muscle was fully conditioned. BACKGROUND. Cardiomyoplasty has consistently improved the functional status of patients, but the short-term effect of latissimus dorsi muscle contraction has not been assessed in these patients. METHODS. Right-heart catheterization, Doppler-echocardiography and maximal exercise testing with expired gas analysis were performed in 10 patients with congestive heart failure who had undergone cardiomyoplasty at least 6 months earlier. Data were obtained when the latissimus dorsi muscle was stimulated every other systole and after stimulation was discontinued for 1 h. The power of this study to detect a 10% difference was > 80%. RESULTS. After cardiomyoplasty, left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 0.22 +/- 0.08 (mean +/- SD) to 0.27 +/- 0.07 after 6 months (p < 0.02 vs. before cardiomyoplasty) and to 0.24 +/- 0.09 after 1 year; functional class went from 3.0 +/- 0.0 to 2.0 +/- 0.5 after 6 months and to 2.0 +/- 0.7 after 1 year (both p < 0.001 vs. before cardiomyoplasty). After discontinuation of latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation, cardiac index did not change (2.28 +/- 0.45 vs. 2.30 +/- 0.46 liters/min per m2). Mean systemic arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were also similar (85.2 +/- 6.0 vs. 88.4 +/- 5.6 mm Hg and 14.9 +/- 7.1 vs. 13.6 +/- 6.8 mm Hg, respectively). Doppler E/A ratio decreased from 1.04 +/- 0.33 to 0.83 +/- 0.25 (p < 0.02), suggesting that left ventricular diastolic function may have been improved by latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation. Peak oxygen consumption was unaltered (1,633 +/- 530 vs. 1,596 +/- 396 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS. Alterations in left ventricular diastolic rather than systolic function may be responsible for the long-term clinical benefits of cardiomyoplasty.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C Chachques, O. Jegaden, T. Mesana, Y. Glock, P. A Grandjean, and A. F Carpentier Cardiac Bioassist: Results of the French Multicenter Cardiomyoplasty Study Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2009; 17(6): 573 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Chachques, O. J. Jegaden, V. Bors, T. Mesana, C. Latremouille, P. A. Grandjean, J. N. Fabiani, and A. Carpentier Heart transplantation following cardiomyoplasty: a biological bridge Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rigatelli, G. Rigatelli, M. Barbiero, A. Cotogni, A. Bandello, R. Riccardi, and U. Carraro "Demand" stimulation of latissimus dorsi heart wrap: experience in humans and comparison with adynamic girdling Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rigatelli, U. Carraro, M. Barbiero, R. Riccardi, F. Cobelli, M. Gemelli, and G. Rigatelli A Review of the Concept of Circulatory Bioassist Focused on the "New" Demand Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty: The Renewal of Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty? Angiology, May 1, 2003; 54(3): 301 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rigatelli, M. Barbiero, G. Rigatelli, R. Riccardi, F. Cobelli, A. Cotogni, A. Bandello, and U. Carraro Maintained benefits and improved survival of dynamic cardiomyoplasty by activity-rest stimulation: 5-year results of the Italian trial on 'demand' dynamic cardiomyoplasty Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rigatelli, U. Carraro, M. Barbiero, M. Zanchetta, K. Dimopoulos, F. Cobelli, R. Riccardi, and G. Rigatelli Activity-rest stimulation protocol improves cardiac assistance in dynamic cardiomyoplasty Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2002; 21(3): 478 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Bocchi Cardiomyoplasty for treatment of heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2001; 3(4): 403 - 406. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Shah, M. Vaynblat, L. Salciccioli, P. Impellizzeri, J. N. Cunningham Jr, and M. Chiavarelli Composite cardiac binding in experimental heart failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 429 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Acker Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: at the crossroads Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 750 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T. Ali, B. Y. Chiang, W. P. Santamore, R. D. Dowling, and A. D. Slater Preconditioning of the latissimus dorsi muscle in cardiomyoplasty: vascular delay or chronic electrical stimulation Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, September 1, 1998; 14(3): 304 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Kawaguchi, Y. Huang, T. Yuasa, C. J. Horam, R. J. Carrington, Z. Biao, P. W. Brady, M. Murase, and S. N. Hunyor Improved efficiency of energy transfer to external work in chronic cardiomyoplasty based on the pressure-volume relationship J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1358 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vaynblat, M. Chiavarelli, H. R. Shah, G. Ramdev, M. Aron, Z. Zisbrod, and J. N. Cunningham Jr Cardiac Binding in Experimental Heart Failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O. Tasdemir, K. M. Vural, S. D. Kucukaksu, O. K. Tarcan, M. Ozdemir, E. Kutuk, and K. Bayazit Comparative Study on Cardiomyoplasty Patients With the Cardiomyostimulator On Versus Off Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1996; 62(6): 1708 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text]