JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 25:1373-1379
© 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callihan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callihan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R.

Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch

RL Callihan, SF Idriss, RW Dahl, PD Wolf, WM Smith, and RE Ideker

Department of Medicine Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to assess the effect of passive "bystander" epicardial electrodes on defibrillation efficacy. BACKGROUND. We hypothesized that an inactive epicardial patch placed in an area of low potential gradient from an endocardial electrode shock might affect defibrillation efficacy through its effects on the shock field and the underlying potential gradient. METHODS. We studied the effects of an inactive 18-cm2 titanium mesh patch placed on the anterolateral left ventricular epicardium on the 50% probability of successful defibrillation. A biphasic shock with both phases 6 ms in duration was delivered between superior vena cava and right ventricular catheter electrodes 10 s after the electrical induction of ventricular fibrillation. Six dogs underwent an up/down defibrillation protocol randomized with or without the patch on the heart. RESULTS. Mean 50% (+/-) probability point for energy doubled with the conductive patch on the heart, from 8.0 +/- 3.2 to 16.8 +/- 7.0 J (p < 0.01), and leading-edge voltage increased from 334 +/- 64 to 477 +/- 98 V (p < 0.01). Mean 50% probability points for energy and leading-edge voltage were not significantly changed when the procedure was repeated using a nonconductive patch in another six dogs as a control group. In a saline-saturated foam model, measurements from electrodes placed around and under the patch revealed a 72% mean decrease in the potential gradient in the foam under the conductive patch. CONCLUSIONS. A passive defibrillator patch can markedly increase the energy requirements for defibrillation, probably by decreasing the potential gradient under the patch. These results suggest the use of caution when passive electrodes are present, for example, when a patient receives a nonthoracotomy defibrillator system while epicardial electrodes from a previously implanted system are left in place.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. R. Paisey, A. M. Yue, F. Bessoule, P. R. Roberts, and J. M. Morgan
Passive electrode effect reduces defibrillation threshold in bi-filament middle cardiac vein defibrillation.
Europace, February 1, 2006; 8(2): 113 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt
Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations
Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3082 - 3088.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.