Prospective case-control comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel disease treated in 1986-1987 versus 1991: improved in-hospital and 12-month results. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study (MAPS) Group

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to ascertain whether early and 12-month clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary revascularization have improved between 1986-1987 and 1991. BACKGROUND. Since the mid-1980s, when the results of percutaneous revascularization were considered to be somewhat static, justifying large-scale clinical trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus other modes of therapy, balloon technology has improved, and several new percutaneous revascularization techniques have become available. The clinical results of the current integrated approach to revascularization compared with those for coronary angioplasty alone in the late 1980s are not known. METHODS. In this prospective case-control study, 200 consecutively treated patients with multivessel disease in 1991 were studied prospectively and compared with 400 consecutive patients from the same centers during 1986-1987. Patients from 1991 were matched with earlier patients on the basis of four previously described prognostic determinants (left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of unstable angina, diabetes and target lesion morphology score) and the treating institution and were assessed for treatment outcome (completeness of revascularization, procedural success and event-free survival [freedom from death, myocardial infarction and further revascularization]). RESULTS. The 1991 cohort of patients was older (mean [+/- SD] age 62 +/- 11 vs. 58 +/- 11 years, p < 0.001) and tended to have slightly worse left ventricular function (ejection fraction 56 +/- 10% vs. 58 +/- 11%, p = 0.009) than the 1986-1987 cohort. Overall lesion morphology risk scores were similar. New devices (other than coronary angioplasty) were used in 26% of patients. The 1991 patient cohort had more frequent total revascularization (35% vs. 21%, p = 0.003), fewer emergency bypass operations (1.0% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.006) and an improved overall procedural success rate (90% vs. 84%, p = 0.04). In addition, at 12 months the event-free survival rate was superior in the 1991 cohort (73.3% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.02), although there was no difference in infarct-free survival rate (94.6% vs. 93.2%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS. Improved results with percutaneous revascularization in 1991 have important implications for patient care and interpretation of ongoing randomized trials enrolling patients in the late 1980s and intending to compare standard coronary angioplasty with other forms of therapy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Batyraliev, M. R. Ayalp, A. Sercelik, Z. Karben, G. Dinler, F. Besnili, S. Ozgul, and I. Perchucov Complications of Cardiac Catheterization: A Single-Center Study Angiology, January 1, 2005; 56(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Whitlow, A. P. Dimas, T. M. Bashore, R. M. Califf, M. G. Bourassa, B. R. Chaitman, A. D. Rosen, K. E. Kip, M. L. Stadius, E. L. Alderman, et al. Relationship of extent of revascularization with angina at one year in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1999; 34(6): 1750 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Schunkert, L. Harrell, and I. F. Palacios Implications of small reference vessel diameter in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1999; 34(1): 40 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Bittl Advances in Coronary Angioplasty N. Engl. J. Med., October 24, 1996; 335(17): 1290 - 1302. [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investiga Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel Disease N. Engl. J. Med., July 25, 1996; 335(4): 217 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]