|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 25:932-936 © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048.
OBJECTIVES. We hypothesized that orthotopic heart transplantation with bicaval and pulmonary venous anastomoses preserves atrial contractility. BACKGROUND. The standard biatrial anastomotic technique of orthotopic heart transplantation causes impaired function and enlargement of the atria. Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows assessment of atrial size and function. METHODS. We studied 16 patients who had undergone bicaval (n = 8) or biatrial (n = 8) orthotopic heart transplantation without evidence of rejection and a control group of 6 healthy volunteers. For all three groups, cine MRI was performed by combining coronal and axial gated spin echo and gradient echo cine sequences. Intracardiac volumes were calculated with the Simpson rule. Atrial emptying fraction was defined as the difference between atrial diastolic and systolic volumes, divided by atrial diastolic volume, expressed in percent. All patients had right heart catheterization. RESULTS. Right atrial emptying fraction was significantly higher in the bicaval (mean [+/- SD] 37 +/- 9%) than in the biatrial group (22 +/- 11%, p < 0.05) and similar to that in the control group (48 +/- 4%). Left atrial emptying fraction was significantly higher in the bicaval (30 +/- 5%) than in the biatrial group (15 +/- 4%, p < 0.05) and significantly lower in both transplant groups than in the control group (47 +/- 5%, p < 0.05). The left atrium was larger in the biatrial than in the control group (p < 0.05). Cardiac index, stroke index, heart rate and blood pressure were similar in the transplant groups. CONCLUSIONS. Left and right atrial emptying fractions are significantly depressed with the biatrial technique and markedly improved with the bicaval technique of orthotopic heart transplantation. The beneficial effects of the latter technique on atrial function could improve allograft exercise performance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schnoor, T. Schafer, D. Luhmann, and H. H. Sievers Bicaval versus standard technique in orthotopic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1322 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G McDowell, M Cave, A Bainbridge, M Danton, C Shaw, K.D Buchanan, J Wallwork, S Large, and D.P Nicholls Is the secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide in man under neural control? Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2000; 21(6): 498 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Pennington, T. E. Oaks, and D. P. Lohmann Permanent ventricular assist device support versus cardiac transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 729 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Y. Sze, R. C. Robbins, C. P. Semba, M. K. Razavi, and M. D. Dake Superior vena cava syndrome after heart transplantation: percutaneous treatment of a complication of bicaval anastomoses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1998; 116(2): 253 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brandt, W. Harringer, S. W. Hirt, K. P. Walluscheck, J. Cremer, H.-H. Sievers, and A. Haverich Influence of Bicaval Anastomoses on Late Occurrence of Atrial Arrhythmia After Heart Transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 70 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Trento, J. M. Takkenberg, L. S. C. Czer, C. Blanche, S. Nessim, M. H. Cohen, R. Kass, S. Raissi, and J. M. Matloff CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH ONE HUNDRED CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS UNDERGOING ORTHOTOPIC HEART TRANSPLANTATION WITH BICAVAL AND PULMONARY VENOUS ANASTOMOSES J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1996; 112(6): 1496 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |