Definition of the best prediction criteria of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram for serious arrhythmic events in the postinfarction period. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial/Signal-Averaged Electrocardiogram (CAST/SAECG) Substudy Investigators

Cardiology Division, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn 11203.

OBJECTIVES. The goal of this study was to establish guidelines for the prognostic use of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) after myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND. Previous studies of the prognostic use of the signal-averaged ECG in postinfarction patients had one or more of the following limitations: a small study group, empiric definition of an abnormal recording and possible bias in the selection of high risk groups or classification of arrhythmic events, or both. To correct for these limitations, a substudy was conducted in conjunction with the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). METHODS. Ten centers recruited 1,211 patients with acute myocardial infarction without application of the ejection fraction or Holter criteria restrictions of the main CAST protocol. Several clinical variables, ventricular arrhythmias on the Holter recording, ejection fraction and six signal-averaged ECG variables were analyzed. Patients with bundle branch block were excluded from the analysis, and the remaining 1,158 were followed for up to 1 year after infarction. The classification of arrhythmic events was reviewed independently by the CAST Events Committee. RESULTS. During an average (+/- SD) follow-up of 10.3 +/- 3.2 months, 45 patients had a serious arrhythmic event (nonfatal ventricular tachycardia or sudden cardiac arrhythmic death). A Cox regression analysis with only the six signal-averaged ECG variables indicated that the filtered QRS duration at 40 Hz > or = 120 ms (QRSD-40 Hz) at a cutpoint > or = 120 ms was the most predictive criterion of arrhythmic events. In a regression analysis that included all clinical, Holter and ejection fraction variables, a QRSD-40 Hz > or = 120 ms was the most significant predictor (p < 0.0001). The positive, negative and total predictive accuracy and odds ratio for QRSD-40 Hz > or = 120 ms were 17%, 98%, 88% and 8.4, respectively, and improved to 32%, 97%, 94% and 16.7, respectively, after combination with ejection fraction < or = 40% and complex ventricular arrhythmias on the Holter recording. CONCLUSIONS. The signal-averaged ECG predicts serious arrhythmic events in the first year after infarction better than do clinical, ejection fraction and ventricular arrhythmia variables, and QRSD-40 Hz > or = 120 ms provides the best predictive criterion in this clinical setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Goldberger, M. E. Cain, S. H. Hohnloser, A. H. Kadish, B. P. Knight, M. S. Lauer, B. J. Maron, R. L. Page, R. S. Passman, D. Siscovick, et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 30, 2008; 52(14): 1179 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Goldberger, M. E. Cain, S. H. Hohnloser, A. H. Kadish, B. P. Knight, M. S. Lauer, B. J. Maron, R. L. Page, R. S. Passman, D. Siscovick, et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14): 1497 - 1518. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Elgarhi, J Kreuz, O Balta, G Nickenig, H Hoium, T Lewalter, and J O. Schwab Significance of Wedensky Modulation testing in the evaluation of non-invasive risk stratification for ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with coronary artery disease and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Heart, April 1, 2008; 94(4): e16 - e16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Enseleit and F. Duru Long-term continuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 255 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Tapanainen, K. S. Lindgren, T. H. Makikallio, O. Vuolteenaho, J. Leppaluoto, and H. V. Huikuri Natriuretic peptides as predictors of non-sudden and sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Antezano and M. Hong Sudden Cardiac Death J Intensive Care Med, November 1, 2003; 18(6): 313 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L Bode-Schnurbus, D Bocker, M Block, R Gradaus, A Heinecke, G Breithardt, and M Borggrefe QRS duration: a simple marker for predicting cardiac mortality in ICD patients with heart failure Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1157 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Huikuri, J. M. Tapanainen, K. Lindgren, P. Raatikainen, T. H. Makikallio, K. E. Juhani Airaksinen, and R. J. Myerburg Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 20, 2003; 42(4): 652 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Huikuri, T. H. Makikallio, M. J. P. Raatikainen, J. Perkiomaki, A. Castellanos, and R. J. Myerburg Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Death: Appraisal of the Studies and Methods Assessing the Risk of Sudden Arrhythmic Death Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 110 - 115. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Bailey, A. S. Berson, H. Handelsman, and M. Hodges Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1902 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Eisenberg Risk stratification for arrhythmic events: are the bangs worth the bucks? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1912 - 1915. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Huikuri, A. Castellanos, and R. J. Myerburg Sudden Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmias N. Engl. J. Med., November 15, 2001; 345(20): 1473 - 1482. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Gomes, M. E. Cain, A. E. Buxton, M. E. Josephson, K. L. Lee, and G. E. Hafley Prediction of Long-Term Outcomes by Signal-Averaged Electrocardiography in Patients With Unsustained Ventricular Tachycardia, Coronary Artery Disease, and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Circulation, July 24, 2001; 104(4): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Yi, K Hnatkova, N.G Mahon, P.J Keeling, M Reardon, A.J Camm, and M Malik Predictive value of wavelet decomposition of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2000; 21(12): 1015 - 1022. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Ikeda, T. Sakata, M. Takami, N. Kondo, N. Tezuka, T. Nakae, M. Noro, Y. Enjoji, R. Abe, K. Sugi, et al. Combined assessment of T-wave alternans and late potentials used to predict arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: A prospective study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2000; 35(3): 722 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Crawford, S. J. Bernstein, P. C. Deedwania, J. P. DiMarco, K. J. Ferrick, A. Garson Jr, L. A. Green, H. L. Greene, M. J. Silka, P. H. Stone, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography) developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 912 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Vazquez, E. B. Caref, F. Torres, M. Reina, A. Espina, and N. El-Sherif Improved diagnostic value of combined time and frequency domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 385 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Bigger and The Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Tria Prophylactic Use of Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators in Patients at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias after Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., November 27, 1997; 337(22): 1569 - 1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Savard, J.-L. Rouleau, J. Ferguson, N. Poitras, P. Morel, R. F. Davies, D. J. Stewart, M. Talajic, M. Gardner, R. Dupuis, et al. Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction Using Signal-Averaged Electrocardiographic Criteria Adjusted for Sex, Age, and Myocardial Infarction Location Circulation, July 1, 1997; 96(1): 202 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Guidelines Developed for Signal-Averaged ECG After MI Journal Watch Cardiology, May 1, 1995; 1995(501): 15 - 15. [Full Text]