JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 25:823-829
© 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frohwein, S
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frohwein, S
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W.

Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease

S Frohwein, JL Klein, A Lane, and WR Taylor

Cardiology Division, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

OBJECTIVES. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, sensitivity and specificity of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has been shown to be an extremely sensitive and specific noninvasive technique for the detection of myocardial ischemia. However, inadequate transthoracic images preclude the use of dobutamine stress echocardiography in a small but significant group of patients. Transesophageal echocardiography provides better resolution than that obtained with routine transthoracic imaging. METHODS. Patients scheduled for routine cardiac catheterization underwent transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography. All patients underwent coronary arteriography within 48 h of the study, and lesion severity was determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Significant coronary obstruction was defined as stenosis > 50%. RESULTS. Fifty-one male patients were enrolled in the study; six were excluded for technical reasons. There were no adverse outcomes or complications. Of 27 patients with significant coronary artery disease, 22 had positive study results (sensitivity 82%). Of 13 patients without significant obstructive coronary disease, 1 had a false positive study result (specificity 93%). In patients with a minimal lumen diameter < 1.25 mm, sensitivity was > 80%, and in patients with a minimal lumen diameter > 1.5 mm, sensitivity was < 70%, suggesting that lesions with a minimal lumen diameter < 1.25 mm are more likely to be physiologically significant. CONCLUSIONS. Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography is a feasible, safe and accurate technique for the detection of myocardial ischemia. There are inherent limitations to this technique in that transesophageal echocardiography must be performed. Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography may allow extension of dobutamine stress testing to patients with inadequate transthoracic echocardiographic imaging and may provide an opportunity for further research applications.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.