|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 25:424-430 © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest stability of echocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular mass and function in patients with hypertension. BACKGROUND. Determination of changes in left ventricular mass may be impaired by study variability. The amount by which variables of mass and left ventricular function must change in an individual patient to exceed temporal variability has not been determined in a multicenter trial. METHODS. Ninety-six patients with hypertension had two-dimensional targeted, M-mode Doppler echocardiography repeated at 6 +/- 8 days by the same technician utilizing the same machine. Left ventricular mass and variables of systolic and diastolic function were measured. Test-retest reliability and the width of the 95% confidence intervals of variable change, as well as the contributions of age, study quality and body size to measurement reliability, were determined. RESULTS. Despite excellent reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation 0.86), the 95% confidence interval width of a single replicate measurement of left ventricular mass was 59g, exceeding usual decreases in mass during treatment. Study quality, which was dependent on age and weight, influenced test reliability. Although the confidence interval width for ejection fraction was narrow (5 U), those for peak early (E) and late (A) diastolic velocities were wide, resulting in a confidence interval width for the E/A ratio of 1.5. CONCLUSIONS. The temporal variability, particularly in obese or elderly patients, or both, of echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass precludes its use to measure changes in mass of the magnitude likely to occur with therapy. Measurement stability is affected by study quality, and age and body weight both influence study quality. Although ejection fraction shows little temporal variability, the large width of the confidence interval of the Doppler E/A ratio impairs its use to serially measure diastolic function.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Evangelista, F. Flachskampf, P. Lancellotti, L. Badano, R. Aguilar, M. Monaghan, J. Zamorano, P. Nihoyannopoulos, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for standardization of performance, digital storage and reporting of echocardiographic studies Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 438 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch and M. F. Di Carli Methods and Limitations of Assessing New Noninvasive Tests: Part II: Outcomes-Based Validation and Reliability Assessment of Noninvasive Testing Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2793 - 2801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-M. Lee, M.-S. Lin, C.-H. Tsai, C.-L. Huang, and N.-C. Chang Effects of sulfonylureas on left ventricular mass in type 2 diabetic patients Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H608 - H613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshinaga, B. J.W. Chow, K. Williams, L. Chen, R. A. deKemp, L. Garrard, A. Lok-Tin Szeto, M. Aung, R. A. Davies, T. D. Ruddy, et al. What is the Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Christian Positively Magnetic North J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1646 - 1648. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Monaghan Role of real time 3D echocardiography in evaluating the left ventricle Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 131 - 136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Marwick Can we Justify the Cost of Echocardiography? Lessons from Outcomes Research Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jenkins, K. Bricknell, L. Hanekom, and T. H. Marwick Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 878 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rajappan, N. G. Bellenger, G. Melina, M. Di Terlizzi, M. H. Yacoub, D. J. Sheridan, and D. J. Pennell Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement - cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 59 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. de Simone, R. B. Devereux, S. G. Myerson, and D. J. Pennell What Is Bright Is Not Always Gold * Response: What Is Old Is Not Always Best Hypertension, June 1, 2003; e10(6): . [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Myerson, H. E. Montgomery, M. J. World, and D. J. Pennell Left Ventricular Mass: Reliability of M-Mode and 2-Dimensional Echocardiographic Formulas Hypertension, November 1, 2002; 40(5): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sherwood, E. C. D. Gullette, A. L. Hinderliter, A. Georgiades, M. Babyak, R. A. Waugh, and J. A. Blumenthal Relationship of Clinic, Ambulatory, and Laboratory Stress Blood Pressure to Left Ventricular Mass in Overweight Men and Women With High Blood Pressure Psychosom Med, March 1, 2002; 64(2): 247 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Myerson, N. G. Bellenger, and D. J. Pennell Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 750 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Feldman, N. Campbell, P. Larochelle, P. Bolli, E. D. Burgess, S. G. Carruthers, J. S. Floras, R. B. Haynes, G. Honos, F. H.H. Leenen, et al. 1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 14, 1999; 161(90120): S1 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Palmieri, B. Dahlof, V. DeQuattro, N. Sharpe, J. N. Bella, G. de Simone, M. Paranicas, D. Fishman, and R. B. Devereux Reliability of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function: The PRESERVE study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1625 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dai, N. A. Ayres, R. B. Harrist, J. T. Bricker, and D. R. Labarthe Validity of Echocardiographic Measurement in an Epidemiological Study : Project HeartBeat! Hypertension, August 1, 1999; 34(2): 236 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Vasan, M. G. Larson, D. Levy, J. C. Evans, and E. J. Benjamin Distribution and Categorization of Echocardiographic Measurements in Relation to Reference Limits : The Framingham Heart Study: Formulation of a Height- and Sex-Specific Classification and Its Prospective Validation Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1863 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Cheitlin, J. S. Alpert, W. F. Armstrong, G. P. Aurigemma, G. A. Beller, F. Z. Bierman, T. W. Davidson, J. L. Davis, P. S. Douglas, L. D. Gillam, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1686 - 1744. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |