|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995; 25:231-238 © 1995 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Red Cross Hospital, Germany.
OBJECTIVES. We compared the effects of bisoprolol on transient myocardial ischemia with those of nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina. BACKGROUND. Both beta-adrenergic blocking agents and calcium antagonists reduce transient ischemic episodes, but comparisons of these agents have been made in only a few larger studies. METHODS. The Total Ischemic Burden Bisoprolol Study (TIBBS) was a randomized double-blind controlled study with two parallel groups; 330 patients from 30 centers in seven European countries with stable angina pectoris, a positive exercise test and more than two transient ischemic episodes during 48 h of Holter monitoring (central evaluation) were included. Of these patients 161 were randomized to receive bisoprolol and 169 to receive nifedipine slow release. There were two treatment phases of 4 weeks each, with 48-h Holter monitoring after each phase. During phase 1, patients received either 10 mg of bisoprolol daily or 2 x 20 mg of nifedipine slow release. During phase 2, they received either 20 mg of bisoprolol daily or 2 x 40 mg of nifedipine slow release. RESULTS. In phase 1 of the trial, 4 weeks of bisoprolol therapy (10 mg daily) reduced the mean [+/- SD] number of transient ischemic episodes from 8.1 +/- 0.6 to 3.2 +/- 0.4/48 h. Nifedipine (2 x 20 mg) reduced transient ischemic episodes from 8.3 +/- 0.5 to 5.9 +/- 0.4/48 h. Total duration of ischemia was reduced from 99.3 +/- 10.1 to 31.9 +/- 5.5 min/48 h with bisoprolol and from 101 +/- 9.1 to 72.6 +/- 8.1 min/48 h with nifedipine. Reductions were statistically significant for both drugs; the difference between bisoprolol and nifedipine was also significant (p < 0.0001). Bisoprolol reduced the heart rate at onset of episodes by 13.7 +/- 1.4 beats/min from a baseline value of 99.5 +/- 1.2 beats/min (p < 0.001). Heart rate was unchanged with nifedipine. Bisoprolol had significantly higher responder rates than nifedipine. Doubling of the dose in phase 2 of the trial had small additive effects. Only bisoprolol showed a marked circadian effect by reducing the morning peak of transient ischemic episodes (by 68% at peak time, 8:00 to 8:59 AM). CONCLUSIONS. Both bisoprolol and nifedipine reduced the number and duration of transient ischemic episodes in patients with chronic stable angina. Bisoprolol was significantly more effective than nifedipine in both doses tested and reduced the morning peak of ischemic activity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Fox, M. A. A. Garcia, D. Ardissino, P. Buszman, P. G. Camici, F. Crea, C. Daly, G. De Backer, P. Hjemdahl, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1341 - 1381. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quintana, T. Gustafsson, P. Sundblad, and J. Langanger The effects of heart rate on myocardial velocity and atrio-ventricular displacement during exercise with and without beta-blockade: a tissue Doppler echocardiographic study Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2005; 6(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Task Force Members, J. Lopez-Sendo, K. Swedberg, J. McMurray, J. Tamargo, A. P. Maggioni, H. Dargie, M. Tendera, F. Waagstein, J. Kjekshus, et al. Expert consensus document on {beta}-adrenergic receptor blockers: The Task Force on Beta-Blockers of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1341 - 1362. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Deanfield, J.-M. Detry, P. Sellier, P. R. Lichtlen, E. Thaulow, J. Bultas, C. Brennan, S. T. Young, B. Beckerman, and CAPE II Trial Investigators Medical treatment of myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease: effect of drug regime and irregular dosing in the CAPE II trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2002; 40(5): 917 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Klein Treatment patterns in stable angina: objectives and reality Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2001; 3(suppl_O): O8 - O11. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Fihn, S. V. Williams, J. Daley, and R. J. Gibbons Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina: Treatment Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2001; 135(8_Part_1): 616 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, J. S. Douglas, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Gardin, M. A. Grunwald, D. Levy, B. W. Lytle, R. A. O'Rourke, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2092 - 2197. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Heidenreich, K. M. McDonald, T. Hastie, B. Fadel, V. Hagan, B. K. Lee, and M. A. Hlatky Meta-analysis of Trials Comparing {beta}-Blockers, Calcium Antagonists, and Nitrates for Stable Angina JAMA, May 26, 1999; 281(20): 1927 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Weber, H. Schneider, T. von Arnim, and W. Urbaszek Heart rate variability and ischaemia in patients with coronary heart disease and stable angina pectoris: Influence of drug therapy and prognostic value Eur. Heart J., January 1, 1999; 20(1): 38 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Stason, C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, J.-F. Caubet, D. Cory, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers Safety of Nifedipine in Angina Pectoris : A Meta-Analysis Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 24 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tzivoni, H. Kadr, S. Braat, W. Rutsch, J. A. Ramires, and I. Kobrin Efficacy of Mibefradil Compared With Amlodipine in Suppressing Exercise-Induced and Daily Silent Ischemia : Results of a Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial Circulation, October 21, 1997; 96(8): 2557 - 2564. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |