Modifying fluoroscopic views reduces operator radiation exposure during coronary angioplasty

Eastern Heart Clinic, Prince Henry Hospital, Little Bay, Sydney, Australia.

OBJECTIVES. This three-part study examined the feasibility of reducing operator radiation exposure during coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND. As case loads and complexity increase, some cardiologists are receiving increasing radiation scatter doses. Techniques to reduce this are therefore becoming more important. METHODS. First, the determinants of the operator dose were assessed by measuring the differences in scatter dose with different camera views. The relative contribution of fluoroscopy as opposed to cine was then quantified. Finally, operators were provided with these data, and subsequent changes in technique were evaluated. RESULTS. Left anterior oblique views resulted in 2.6 to 6.1 times the operator dose of equivalently angled right anterior oblique views. Increasing steepness of the left anterior oblique view also resulted in a progressive increase in operator dose, with left anterior oblique 90 degrees causing eight times the dose of left anterior oblique 30 degrees and three times that of left anterior oblique 60 degrees. In the 45 coronary angioplasty cases prospectively analyzed, fluoroscopy was found to be a greater source of total radiation than cine by a 6.3:1 ratio (range 1.1 to 15.8). Once operators were made aware of the importance of left anterior oblique fluoroscopy, there was a marked reduction in its use. When this was not feasible, there was a reduction in the steepness of the angulation. Left anterior oblique fluoroscopy during angioplasty of the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries was reduced from 40% of total screening time to approximately 5%, and left anterior oblique angulation for fluoroscopy during angioplasty of the right coronary artery decreased from 43.6 degrees (+/- 9.1 degrees) to 29.4 degrees (+/- 2.2 degrees). Success rates (90% vs. 89%) and screening times (19.5 vs. 20.7 min) remained unchanged in 200 coronary angioplasties performed after the study. Average operator radiation dose (measured by radiation badges worn under lead at waist level) was reduced from 32.6 to 14.3 microSv/operator per week despite a slight increase in case load. CONCLUSIONS. Fluoroscopy is the major source of total radiation exposure during coronary angioplasty, with left anterior oblique views providing the highest dose. Modification of views is feasible and will result in significant reduction of operator radiation dose.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A D Timmis, C Baker, S Banerjee, A L Calver, A Dornhorst, K M English, J Flint, M E Speechly-Dick, and D Turner Women in UK cardiology: report of a Working Group of the British Cardiac Society Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 283 - 289. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kuon, J. B. Dahm, K. Empen, D. M. Robinson, G. Reuter, and M. Wucherer Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1420 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Kuon, J Birkel, M Schmitt, and J B Dahm Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1205 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Bashore, E. R. Bates, P. B. Berger, D. A. Clark, J. T. Cusma, G. J. Dehmer, M. J. Kern, W. K. Laskey, M. P. O'Laughlin, S. Oesterle, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents endorsed by the American Heart Association and the Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the AHA J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2170 - 2214. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Cusma, M. R. Bell, M. A. Wondrow, J. P. Taubel, and D. R. Holmes Jr. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 427 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]