Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 24:1334-1341
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, C.
Right arrow Articles by McComb, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scott, C.
Right arrow Articles by McComb, J.

Sinus node function after cardiac transplantation

CD Scott, JH Dark, and JM McComb

Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES. This study aimed to examine changes over time in sinus mode function after cardiac transplantation; to determine the incidence, natural history and etiology of sinus node dysfunction in transplant recipients; and to identify any early predictors of long-term sinus node function. BACKGROUND. Bradyarrhythmias caused by sinus node dysfunction are common immediately after cardiac transplantation. Existing electrophysiologic studies have been limited by small numbers and have reported an unexpectedly high incidence of sinus node dysfunction (approximately 50%) compared with the incidence of bradyarrhythmias in other studies. There have been no previous studies reporting serial electrophysiologic data. Thus, the natural history of sinus node dysfunction after transplantation has not been adequately described. METHODS. Serial electrophysiologic studies of sinus node function and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were performed at 1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after transplantation in 40 adult recipients. RESULTS. The overall incidence of sinus node dysfunction was 17.5% (7 of 40). Six patients (15%) had sinus node dysfunction from week 1; one developed sinus node dysfunction at 3 months. Sinus node recovery time returned to normal by 6 weeks in all six patients with early sinus node dysfunction, but abnormalities of sinoatrial conduction persisted in two. Two patients who required pacing during ambulatory monitoring at 2 weeks after transplantation (temporary pacemaker 50 beats/min, demand) received a permanent pacemaker. One patient required pacing at 3 weeks and continued to require pacing 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS. The incidence of sinus node dysfunction after cardiac transplantation is lower than has been previously reported in electrophysiologic studies. Sinus node automaticity improves with time, although abnormalities of sinoatrial conduction may persist. The best predictor of permanent pacing requirements is the temporary pacing requirements during 24-h Holter monitoring 2 and 3 weeks after transplantation, with temporary pacing set at 50 beats/min on demand.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): e1 - e62.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Writing Committee Members, A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): e350 - e408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
C. Hasdemir, K. Chandrasekaran, R. Lazzara, and D. W. Reynolds
Sinus Node Dysfunction in a Heart Transplant Patient Secondary to Severe Sinus Node Artery Obstruction: A Case Report
Angiology, November 1, 2003; 54(6): 725 - 728.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N.D. Holt, K. Hetherington, S. Brady, J.H. Dark, and J.M. McComb
Electrophysiological properties of the recipient atrial remnant after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(3): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement