Cost-effectiveness of a new short-stay unit to "rule out" acute myocardial infarction in low risk patients
JM Gaspoz,
TH Lee,
MC Weinstein,
EF Cook,
P Goldman,
AL Komaroff,
and
L Goldman
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
OBJECTIVES. This study attempted to determine the safety and costs of a new short-stay unit for low risk patients who may be admitted to a hospital to rule out myocardial infarction or ischemia. BACKGROUND. One strategy to reduce the costs of ruling out acute myocardial infarction in low risk patients is to develop alternatives to coronary care units. METHODS. The short-term and 6-month clinical outcomes and costs for 592 patients admitted to a short-stay coronary observation unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital with a low (< or = 10%) probability of acute myocardial infarction were compared with those for 924 consecutive comparison patients who were eligible for the same unit but were admitted to other hospital settings or discharged home. Actual costs were calculated using detailed cost-accounting methods that incorporated nursing intensity weights. RESULTS. The rate of major complications, recurrent myocardial infarction or cardiac death during 6 months after the initial presentation of the 592 patients admitted to the coronary observation unit was similar to that of the 924 comparison patients before and after adjustment for clinical factors influencing triage and initial diagnoses (adjusted relative risk 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.53). Their median total costs (25th, 75th percentile) at 6 months ($1,927; 1,455, 3,650) were significantly lower than for comparison patients admitted to the wards $4,712; 1,868, 11,187), to stepdown or intermediate care units ($4,031; 2,069, 9,169) or to the coronary care unit ($9,201; 3,171, 20,011) but were higher than for comparison patients discharged home from the emergency department ($403; 403,927) before and after the same adjustments (all adjusted p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that the coronary observation unit may be a safe and cost-saving alternative to current triage strategies for patients with a low risk of acute myocardial infarction admitted from the emergency department. Its replication in other hospitals should be tested.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Iannone and T Lenzi
Effectiveness of a multipurpose observation unit: before and after study
Emerg. Med. J.,
June 1, 2009;
26(6):
407 - 414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Siebens, P. Moons, S. De Geest, H. Miljoen, B. J. Drew, and C. Vrints
The Role of Nurses in a Chest Pain Unit
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing,
December 1, 2007;
6(4):
265 - 272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Arnold, S. Goodacre, F. Morris, and on behalf of the ESCAPE Research Team
Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE Trial
Emerg. Med. J.,
July 1, 2007;
24(7):
462 - 466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Ebeling Barbier, T. Bjerner, L. Johansson, L. Lind, and H. Ahlstrom
Myocardial Scars More Frequent Than Expected: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Potential Risk Group
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 15, 2006;
48(4):
765 - 771.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R L Kennedy and R F Harrison
Identification of patients with evolving coronary syndromes by using statistical models with data from the time of presentation
Heart,
February 1, 2006;
92(2):
183 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Christenson, G. Innes, D. McKnight, B. Boychuk, E. Grafstein, C. R. Thompson, F. Rosenberg, A. H. Anis, K. Gin, J. Tilley, et al.
Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
June 8, 2004;
170(12):
1803 - 1807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Goldman and A. J. Kirtane
Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain and Possible Cardiac Ischemia: The Elusive Search for Diagnostic Perfection
Ann Intern Med,
December 16, 2003;
139(12):
987 - 995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M W Cooke, J Higgins, and P Kidd
Use of emergency observation and assessment wards: a systematic literature review
Emerg. Med. J.,
March 1, 2003;
20(2):
138 - 142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Taylor, A Forrest-Hay, and S Meek
ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?
Emerg. Med. J.,
September 1, 2002;
19(5):
395 - 399.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Pelter, M. G. Adams, and B. J. Drew
Association of Transient Myocardial Ischemia With Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes for Angina Patients Treated in a Telemetry Unit or a Coronary Care Unit
Am. J. Crit. Care.,
July 1, 2002;
11(4):
318 - 325.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Pra and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness
Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation
Heart,
February 1, 2001;
85(2):
133 - 142.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Goodacre, F. Morris, J. Arnold, and K. Angelini
Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?
Emerg. Med. J.,
January 1, 2001;
18(1):
11 - 14.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Abenhaim, S. R. Kahn, J. Raffoul, and M. R. Becker
Program description: a hospitalist-run, medical short-stay unit in a teaching hospital
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
November 28, 2000;
163(11):
1477 - 1480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Calvin, L. W. Klein, E. J. VandenBerg, P. Meyer, and J. E. Parrillo
Validated risk stratification model accurately predicts low risk in patients with unstable angina
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 15, 2000;
36(6):
1803 - 1808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Quin
Chest pain evaluation units
Emerg. Med. J.,
July 1, 2000;
17(4):
237 - 240.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Dagnone, C. Collier, W. Pickett, N. Ali, M. Miller, D. Tod, and R. Morton
Chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiogram in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial of two cardiac marker regimens
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
May 30, 2000;
162(11):
1561 - 1566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Nihoyannopoulos
Early risk-stratification in patients with angina but non-diagnostic ECG
Eur. Heart J.,
March 1, 2000;
21(5):
344 - 345.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W Goodacre
Should we establish chest pain observation units in the UK? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature
Emerg. Med. J.,
January 1, 2000;
17(1):
1 - 6.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Edwards and M. Hensher
Managing demand: Managing demand for secondary care services: the changing context
BMJ,
July 11, 1998;
317(7151):
135 - 138.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Rosenthal, C. A. Sirio, L. B. Shepardson, D. L. Harper, A. J. Rotondi, and G. S. Cooper
Use of Intensive Care Units for Patients With Low Severity of Illness
Arch Intern Med,
May 25, 1998;
158(10):
1144 - 1151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Roberts, R. J. Zalenski, E. K. Mensah, R. J. Rydman, G. Ciavarella, L. Gussow, K. Das, L. M. Kampe, B. Dickover, M. F. McDermott, et al.
Costs of an Emergency Department--Based Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol vs Hospitalization in Patients With Chest Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA,
November 26, 1997;
278(20):
1670 - 1676.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Zalenski, M. McCarren, R. Roberts, R. J. Rydman, B. Jovanovic, K. Das, J. Mendez, M. El-Khadra, L. Fraker, and M. McDermott
An Evaluation of a Chest Pain Diagnostic Protocol to Exclude Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department
Arch Intern Med,
May 26, 1997;
157(10):
1085 - 1091.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|