|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 24:940-947 © 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh 15212.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to compare measures of coronary flow reserve by an intracoronary Doppler guide wire with results of stress single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium-201 imaging in patients with intermediate coronary artery disease (40% to 70% stenosis). BACKGROUND. Visual assessment of the coronary arteriogram as a means of predicting the physiologic significance of intermediate coronary stenoses is inaccurate. Coronary flow reserve is a reliable marker of the functional importance of a coronary lesion. The recent development of an intracoronary Doppler guide wire permits routine assessment of coronary flow reserve distal to coronary artery stenoses. METHODS. We prospectively evaluated coronary flow reserve in 30 subjects with intermediate stenoses using an intracoronary Doppler guide wire during elective coronary angiography. Patients subsequently underwent stress SPECT thallium-201 testing, and the blinded interpretations were correlated. Coronary flow reserve in a control group with normal coronary arteries classified our sample into group 1 (abnormal flow reserve, < 2.0) and group 2 (normal flow reserve, > or = 2.0). RESULTS. As defined, the coronary flow reserve of 16 vessels in group 1 was diminished in comparison to that of 19 vessels in group 2 (p = 0.0001). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of stress SPECT thallium-201 images confirmed perfusion defects in 15 of 16 vascular territories in group 1 in contrast to 1 of 19 regions in group 2. The sensitivity, specificity and overall predictive accuracy of Doppler-determined coronary flow reserve for stress SPECT thallium-201 results were 94%, 95% and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. In appropriately selected patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses, Doppler guide wire determination of lesion significance provides equivalent data to those acquired by stress SPECT thallium-201 imaging.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Barmeyer, A. Stork, K. Muellerleile, C. Tiburtius, A. K. Schofer, T. A. Heitzer, T. Hofmann, G. Adam, T. Meinertz, and G. K. Lund Contrast-enhanced Cardiac MR Imaging in the Detection of Reduced Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 377 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J.-W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, E. Eeckhout, W. F. Fearon, S. T. Higano, M. J. Lim, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1321 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ogawa, T. Ohkubo, R. Fukazawa, M. Kamisago, Y. Kuramochi, Y. Uchikoba, E. Ikegami, M. Watanabe, and Y. Katsube Estimation of myocardial hemodynamics before and after intervention in children with kawasaki disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 653 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lethen and H. Lambertz Doppler echocardiographic assessment of coronary artery disease: a challenge becomes reality Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 5 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Voudris, D. Avramides, M. Koutelou, J. Malakos, A. Manginas, M. Papadakis, and D. V. Cokkinos Relative Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Improves Correlation With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1266 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takagi, K. Ohmori, K. Yukiiri, I. Kondo, Y. Yu, A. Oshita, H. Takeuchi, K. Mizushige, and M. Kohno Quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis by harmonic power Doppler with a simple pulsing sequence and vasodilator stress in patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2060 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Skalidis, G. E. Kochiadakis, N. E. Igoumenidis, K. E. Vardakis, and P. E. Vardas Phasic coronary blood flow velocity pattern and flow reserve in the atrium: regulation of left atrial myocardial perfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. J. Chamuleau, R. A. Tio, C. C. de Cock, E. D. de Muinck, N. H. J. Pijls, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, K. T. Koch, M. Meuwissen, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, A. de Jong, et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 852 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Miller Coronary flow studies for risk stratification in multivessel disease: A physiologic bridge too far? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 859 - 863. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Taki, S. Fujino, K. Nakajima, I. Matsunari, H. Okazaki, T. Saga, H. Bunko, and N. Tonami 99mTc-Sestamibi Retention Characteristics During Pharmacologic Hyperemia in Human Myocardium: Comparison with Coronary Flow Reserve Measured by Doppler Flowire J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2001; 42(10): 1457 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Daimon, H. Watanabe, H. Yamagishi, T. Muro, K. Akioka, K. Hirata, K. Takeuchi, and J. Yoshikawa Physiologic assessment of coronary artery stenosis by coronary flow reserve measurements with transthoracic doppler echocardiography: comparison with exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1310 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Meuwissen, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, K. T. Koch, A. de Jong, R. J. de Winter, C. E. Schotborgh, M. Bax, H. J. Verberne, J. G. P. Tijssen, et al. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestambi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1316 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Meuwissen, S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Siebes, C. E. Schotborgh, K. T. Koch, R. J. de Winter, M. Bax, A. de Jong, J. A. E. Spaan, and J. J. Piek Role of Variability in Microvascular Resistance on Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Lesions Circulation, January 16, 2001; 103(2): 184 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Skalidis, G. E. Kochiadakis, S. I. Koukouraki, S. I. Chrysostomakis, N. E. Igoumenidis, N. S. Karkavitsas, and P. E. Vardas Myocardial perfusion in patients with permanent ventricular pacing and normal coronary arteries J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 124 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sakuma, J. W. Koskenvuo, P. Niemi, N. Kawada, J. O. Toikka, J. Knuuti, H. Laine, M. Saraste, M. Kormano, and J. J. Hartiala Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Fast Velocity-Encoded Cine MR Imaging: Validation Study Using Positron Emission Tomography Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1029 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wakatsuki, M. Nakamura, T. Tsunoda, H. Toma, T. Degawa, T. Oki, and T. Yamaguchi Coronary flow velocity immediately after primary coronary stenting as a predictor of ventricular wall motion recovery in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1835 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kern Coronary Physiology Revisited : Practical Insights From the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.J Piek, E Boersma, C di Mario, E Schroeder, C Vrints, P Probst, B de Bruyne, C Hanet, E Fleck, M Haude, et al. Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2000; 21(6): 466 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kern, S. Puri, R. G. Bach, T. J. Donohue, P. Dupouy, E. A. Caracciolo, W. R. Craig, F. Aguirre, E. Aptecar, T. L. Wolford, et al. Abnormal Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve After Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients : Role of Relative Coronary Reserve to Assess Potential Mechanisms Circulation, December 21, 1999; 100(25): 2491 - 2498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H J Verberne, J J Piek, R A M van Liebergen, K T Koch, J M Schroeder-Tanka, and E A van Royen Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by Doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with 99mTc MIBI SPECT Heart, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 509 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Takagi, Y. Tsurumi, Y. Ishii, K. Suzuki, M. Kawana, and H. Kasanuki Clinical Potential of Intravascular Ultrasound for Physiological Assessment of Coronary Stenosis : Relationship Between Quantitative Ultrasound Tomography and Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Abizaid, G. S. Mintz, R. Mehran, A. Abizaid, A. J. Lansky, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, H. Wu, C. Pappas, K. M. Kent, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Was Not Performed Based on Intravascular Ultrasound Findings : Importance of Lumen Dimensions Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 256 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishioka, A. M. Amanullah, H. Luo, H. Berglund, C.-J. Kim, T. Nagai, N. Hakamata, S. Katsushika, A. Uehata, B. Takase, et al. Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity: Comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 1870 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Skalidis, G. E. Kochiadakis, S. I. Koukouraki, F. I. Parthenakis, N. S. Karkavitsas, and P. E. Vardas Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1338 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferrari, B.a. Schnell, G. S. Werner, and H. R. Figulla Safety of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal coronary flow velocity reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 82 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hozumi, K. Yoshida, T. Akasaka, Y. Asami, Y. Ogata, T. Takagi, S. Kaji, T. Kawamoto, Y. Ueda, and S. Morioka Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: Comparison with invasive technique J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1251 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z S Kyriakides, A Antoniadis, T M Kolettis, and D T Kremastinos Coronary flow reserve in the contralateral artery increases after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels Heart, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 493 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Baumgart, M. Haude, G. Goerge, J. Ge, S. Vetter, N. Dagres, G. Heusch, and R. Erbel Improved Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity Using the Relative Flow Velocity Reserve Circulation, July 7, 1998; 98(1): 40 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hozumi, K. Yoshida, Y. Ogata, T. Akasaka, Y. Asami, T. Takagi, and S. Morioka Noninvasive Assessment of Significant Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Stenosis by Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve With Transthoracic Color Doppler Echocardiography Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1557 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Akasaka, K. Yoshida, A. Yamamuro, T. Hozumi, T. Takagi, S. Morioka, and J. Yoshikawa Phasic Coronary Flow Characteristics in Patients With Constrictive Pericarditis : Comparison With Restrictive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1874 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Heller, C. Cates, J. Popma, L. I. Deckelbaum, J. D. Joye, S. T. Dahlberg, B. J. Villegas, A. Arnold, R. Kipperman, W. C. Grinstead, et al. Intracoronary Doppler Assessment of Moderate Coronary Artery Disease : Comparison With 201Tl Imaging and Coronary Angiography Circulation, July 15, 1997; 96(2): 484 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Iwakura, H. Ito, S. Takiuchi, Y. Taniyama, Y. Nakatsuchi, S. Negoro, Y. Higashino, A. Okamura, T. Masuyama, M. Hori, et al. Alternation in the Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Pattern in Patients With No Reflow and Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 15, 1996; 94(6): 1269 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |