JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 24:703-708
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morillo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morillo, C.

Effect of shock timing on efficacy and safety of internal cardioversion for ventricular tachycardia

HG Li, R Yee, R Mehra, P DeGroot, GJ Klein, M Zardini, RK Thakur, and CA Morillo

Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

OBJECTIVES. We examined the effect of shock timing within the QRS complex on cardioversion efficacy in a randomized crossover test of shocks delivered at two timing intervals relative to QRS onset. BACKGROUND. The local ventricular electrogram is used in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to synchronize cardioversion shocks to terminate ventricular tachycardia. However, the timing of the local electrogram relative to global ventricular depolarization is variable, depending on the site of ventricular tachycardia origin. METHODS. Transvenous defibrillation leads were positioned in the right ventricular apex (cathode), coronary sinus and superior vena cava (anodes) of patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. After repeat ventricular tachycardia induction, sequential shocks with energy settings of 0.5 to 22 J were delivered simultaneously with QRS onset (QRS + 0 shock) or 100 ms after QRS onset (QRS + 100 shock). QRS onset was determined from the surface electrocardiogram. Cardioversion threshold, defined as the lowest shock energy for successful ventricular tachycardia termination, was measured for these two timings. RESULTS. Fifteen patients (13 men, 2 women; mean [+/- SD] age 60.5 +/- 7.7 years) completed testing. Cardioversion threshold was significantly lower with QRS + 100 shocks than QRS + 0 shocks (3.1 +/- 3.5 vs. 10.5 +/- 7.4 J, p < 0.01). Thirteen patients (87%) experienced ventricular tachycardia acceleration with QRS + 0 shocks, but only three patients (20%) had ventricular tachycardia acceleration using QRS + 100 shocks (p < 0.01). Of the 32 failed QRS + 0 shocks, 25 (78%) caused ventricular tachycardia acceleration, whereas only 5 (36%) of the 14 failed QRS + 100 shocks caused ventricular tachycardia acceleration (p < 0.05). Cardioversion threshold was not correlated with ventricular tachycardia cycle length, QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction or left ventricular diastolic volume (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS. Internal cardioversion shocks delivered late in the QRS complex during ventricular tachycardia are more effective and have a lower risk of ventricular tachycardia acceleration than those delivered near QRS onset.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. A. Mowrey, Y. Cheng, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 27 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. L. Pinski and G. J. Fahy
The Proarrhythmic Potential of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1651 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.