Coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in patients > 70 years old matched for ventricular function

Mid America Heart Institute, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.

OBJECTIVES. This study compared the relative risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients > 70 years old. BACKGROUND. Few objective, comparative data exist to guide the clinician in the decision to use bypass surgery or angioplasty in elderly patients. METHODS. The study was a case-control, retrospective analysis of 195 consecutive patients who underwent bypass surgery in 1987 and 1988 and were compared with a concurrent cohort of 195 coronary angioplasty-treated patients. The groups were matched for left ventricular function, age and gender mix. RESULTS. The in-hospital morbidity and mortality rates were significantly lower in the coronary angioplasty-treated patients. Mean postprocedural hospital stay was 4.8 and 14.3 days for angioplasty and surgical group patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In-hospital death occurred in 2% of angioplasty-treated patients compared with 9% of surgically treated patients (p = 0.007). Serious in-hospital stroke occurred in no patient in the angioplasty group and in 5% of patients in the surgical group (p < 0.0001). Q wave infarction occurred in 1% of angioplasty-treated patients and 6% of bypass-treated patients (p = 0.01). The 5-year actuarial survival rate was similar in the two groups: 63% in the angioplasty group, 65% in the bypass group (p = NS). However, surgical group patients experienced less recurrent angina, required fewer repeat revascularization procedures and had fewer Q wave infarctions during follow-up compared with angioplasty group patients. CONCLUSIONS. When performed in patients > 70 years old, angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery result in similar long-term survival rates but otherwise distinctly different clinical courses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. G. P. Roberts, E. Guallar, and A. Rodriguez Efficacy and Safety of Statin Monotherapy in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2007; 62(8): 879 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Williams, J. L. Fleg, P. A. Ades, B. R. Chaitman, N. H. Miller, S. M. Mohiuddin, I. S. Ockene, C. B. Taylor, and N. K. Wenger Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in the Elderly (With Emphasis on Patients >=75 Years of Age): An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Circulation, April 9, 2002; 105(14): 1735 - 1743. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kilo, H. Baumer, M. Czerny, M. J. Hiesmayr, M. Ploner, E. Wolner, and M. Grimm Target vessel revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in elderly high-risk patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 537 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Braunwald, E. M. Antman, J. W. Beasley, R. M. Califf, M. D. Cheitlin, J. S. Hochman, R. H. Jones, D. Kereiakes, J. Kupersmith, T. N. Levin, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 970 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Meier Coronary angioplasty after the age of 80 -- why not dust where the dust is? Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1771 - 1772. [PDF]

				J. De Gregorio, Y. Kobayashi, R. Albiero, B. Reimers, C. Di Mario, L. Finci, and A. Colombo Coronary artery stenting in the elderly: short-term outcome and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Behrendt Use and Misuse of the Ejection Fraction Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1166 - 1168. [Full Text]