JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 23:1625-1629
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauptman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loh, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hauptman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loh, E

Pericardial effusions after cardiac transplantation

PJ Hauptman, GS Couper, SF Aranki, A Kartashov, GH Mudge Jr, and E Loh

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to determine the etiologic factors in the formation of significant pericardial effusion after orthotopic heart transplantation and to determine the association of pericardial effusion with survival. BACKGROUND. The formation of pericardial effusions has been well described after orthotopic heart transplantation, but the risk factors for development of effusions remain unclear. Rejection and cyclosporine have been cited as possible causes, but anatomic factors have not been studied. METHODS. We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and echocardiograms of 203 consecutive patients at one center, including ischemic time, incidence and severity of rejection, weight difference between donor and recipient and previous cardiac surgical history. Multivariate analysis was performed, and actuarial survival rate curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS. Eighteen (8.9%) of 203 transplant recipients developed moderate to large pericardial effusions. Forty-four percent of patients required pericardiocentesis, and 28% subsequently required pericardiectomy for management of the effusions. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of a positive weight difference between recipient and donor (recipient weight > donor weight) and the lack of previous median sternotomy as the most powerful predictors of effusion formation. No significant association was found with rejection. There was no difference in actuarial survival rate between patients with and without effusions. CONCLUSIONS. A positive mismatch in weight between recipient and donor and the absence of previous cardiac surgery are associated with the formation of significant pericardial effusions. Closer monitoring of these patients at risk may be warranted.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
V. Vijay and J. P. Gold
Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 521 - 537.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. A. Quin, M. P. Tauriainen, L. M. Huber, D. D. McIntire, P. A. Kaiser, W. S. Ring, and M. E. Jessen
Predictors of pericardial effusion after orthotopic heart transplantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2002; 124(5): 979 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O. Nugue, A. Millaire, H. Porte, P. de Groote, P. Guimier, A. Wurtz, and G. Ducloux
Pericardioscopy in the Etiologic Diagnosis of Pericardial Effusion in 141 Consecutive Patients
Circulation, October 1, 1996; 94(7): 1635 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.