Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 23:1547-1553
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karjalainen, J
Right arrow Articles by Manninen, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karjalainen, J
Right arrow Articles by Manninen, V

Relation between QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min in rest electrocardiograms of men and a simple method to adjust QT interval values

J Karjalainen, M Viitasalo, M Manttari, and V Manninen

Central Military Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to establish the relation between QT intervals and a wide range of rest heart rates in men. These data provided the basis of a simple method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate. BACKGROUND. Earlier correction equations give conflicting results, especially at low and high heart rates. METHODS. The QT intervals were measured in 324 electrocardiograms of healthy young men. The sample was weighted for low and high heart rates. A curve relating QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min was constructed. The QT interval at 60 beats/min was used as the reference value, and an adjusting nomogram for different heart rates was created. The reliabilities of the nomogram and three earlier QT correction equations were tested in the study group and in 396 middle-aged men. RESULTS. The nomogram method presented (QTNc = QT + correcting number) adjusted the QT interval most accurately over the whole range of heart rates on the basis of smallest mean-squared residual values between measured and predicted QT intervals. The Fridericia formula (QTFc = QT/RR1/3) gave the best correction at low, but failed at high, heart rates. The linear regression equation (QTLc = QT + 0.154[1 - RR], Framingham Study) was reliable at normal, but failed at low and high, heart rates. The Bazett formula (QTc = QT/RR1/2) performed poorest at all heart rates. The relation between QT and RR intervals was determined by three linear regressions expressing the slopes 0.116 for heart rates < 60 beats/min, 0.156 for heart rates from 60 to 100 beats/min and 0.384 for heart rates > 100 beats/min. CONCLUSIONS. The QT-RR relation over a wide range of heart rates does not permit the use of one simple adjustment equation. A nomogram providing, for every heart rate, the number of milliseconds that the QT interval must be corrected gives excellent adjustment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. M. Rautaharju, B. Surawicz, and L. S. Gettes
AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST Segment, T and U Waves, and the QT Interval A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2009; 53(11): 982 - 991.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Rautaharju, B. Surawicz, and L. S. Gettes
AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST Segment, T and U Waves, and the QT Interval: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology
Circulation, March 17, 2009; 119(10): e241 - e250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. N. Viswanathan and R. L. Page
Short QT: When Does It Matter?
Circulation, August 14, 2007; 116(7): 686 - 688.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O. Anttonen, M.J. Junttila, H. Rissanen, A. Reunanen, M. Viitasalo, and H.V. Huikuri
Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Short QT Interval in a Middle-Aged Finnish Population
Circulation, August 14, 2007; 116(7): 714 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Viitasalo, L. Oikarinen, H. Swan, H. Vaananen, J. Jarvenpaa, H. Hietanen, J. Karjalainen, and L. Toivonen
Effects of Beta-Blocker Therapy on Ventricular Repolarization Documented by 24-h Electrocardiography in Patients With Type 1 Long-QT Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 747 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Mozaffarian, R. J. Prineas, P. K. Stein, and D. S. Siscovick
Dietary Fish and n-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Cardiac Electrocardiographic Parameters in Humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 478 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Sugao, A Fujiki, M Sakabe, K Nishida, T Tsuneda, J Iwamoto, K Mizumaki, and H Inoue
New quantitative methods for evaluation of dynamic changes in QT interval on 24 hour Holter ECG recordings: QT interval in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and long QT syndrome
Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. J. Drew, R. M. Califf, M. Funk, E. S. Kaufman, M. W. Krucoff, M. M. Laks, P. W. Macfarlane, C. Sommargren, S. Swiryn, and G. F. Van Hare
Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: Endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2721 - 2746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Oikarinen, M. S. Nieminen, M. Viitasalo, L. Toivonen, S. Jern, B. Dahlof, R. B. Devereux, P. M. Okin, and for the LIFE Study Investigators
QRS Duration and QT Interval Predict Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study
Hypertension, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 1029 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Malfatto, M. Facchini, and A. Zaza
Characterization of the non-linear rate-dependency of QT interval in humans
Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(2): 163 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L Toivonen
More light on QT interval measurement
Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 193 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Malik, P Farbom, V Batchvarov, K Hnatkova, and A J Camm
Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval
Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 220 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A Plewan, G Lehmann, G Ndrepepa, J Schreieck, E.U Alt, A Schomig, and C Schmitt
Maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. Sotalol vs bisoprolol
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1504 - 1510.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Benatar and T Decraene
Comparison of formulae for heart rate correction of QT interval in exercise ECGs from healthy children
Heart, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 199 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K J Paavonen, H Swan, K Piippo, L Hokkanen, P Laitinen, M Viitasalo, L Toivonen, and K Kontula
Response of the QT interval to mental and physical stress in types LQT1 and LQT2 of the long QT syndrome
Heart, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
J. A. Reiffel and G. Appel
Importance of QT Interval Determination and Renal Function Assessment During Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 1, 2001; 6(2): 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Glatter, Y. Yang, K. Chatterjee, G. Modin, J. Cheng, S. Kayser, and M. M. Scheinman
Chemical Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter With Ibutilide in Patients Receiving Amiodarone Therapy
Circulation, January 16, 2001; 103(2): 253 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Zabel, M. R. Franz, T. Klingenheben, B. Mansion, H.-P. Schultheiss, and S. H. Hohnloser
Rate-dependence of QT dispersion and the QT interval: comparison of atrial pacing and exercise testing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1654 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M.C. de Bruyne, A.W. Hoes, J.A. Kors, A. Hofman, J.H. van Bemmel, and D.E. Grobbee
Prolonged QT interval predicts cardiac and all-cause mortality in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 1999; 20(4): 278 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Swan, K. Saarinen, K. Kontula, L. Toivonen, and M. Viitasalo
Evaluation of QT interval duration and dispersion and proposed clinical criteria in diagnosis of long QT syndrome in patients with a genetically uniform type of LQT1
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 486 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L Oikarinen, L Toivonen, and M Viitasalo
Electrocardiographic measures of ventricular repolarisation dispersion in patients with coronary artery disease susceptible to ventricular fibrillation
Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 554 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Smetana, V. N. Batchvarov, K. Hnatkova, A. J. Camm, and M. Malik
Sex differences in repolarization homogeneity and its circadian pattern
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): H1889 - H1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement