|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 23:1179-1185 © 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of acoustic quantification compared with Doppler echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. BACKGROUND. Diastolic dysfunction usually accompanies left ventricular hypertrophy. Although Doppler echocardiography is widely used, it has known limitations in the diagnosis of diastolic abnormalities. The ventricular area-change waveform obtained with acoustic quantification technology may provide an alternative to assess diastolic dysfunction. METHODS. Potential acoustic quantification variables (peak rate of area change and mean slope of area change rate during rapid filling, amount of relative area change during rapid filling and atrial contraction) were obtained and compared with widely used Doppler indexes of ventricular filling (isovolumetric relaxation time, pressure half-time, peak early diastolic velocity/peak late diastolic velocity ratio, rapid filling, atrial contribution to filling) in 16 healthy volunteers and 30 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. RESULTS. Criteria for abnormal relaxation were present in 68% of patients by acoustic quantification and in 64% of patients by Doppler echocardiography. However, abnormal relaxation was identified in 80% of patients by one or both methods. Acoustic quantification indicated abnormal relaxation in the presence of completely normalized Doppler patterns and in patients with mitral regurgitation or abnormal rhythm with unreliable Doppler patterns. CONCLUSIONS. Acoustic quantification potentially presents a new way to assess diastolic dysfunction. This technique may be regarded as complementary to Doppler echocardiography. The combined use of the methods may improve the diagnosis of left ventricular relaxation abnormalities.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Salem, A. Y. Denault, P. Couture, S. Belisle, A. Fortier, M.-C. Guertin, M. Carrier, and R. Martineau Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure is a predictor of mortality in cardiac surgery independently of left ventricular ejection fraction Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 292 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mor-Avi, K. Spencer, J. Gorcsan, A. Demaria, T. Kimball, M. Monaghan, J. Perez, J. P. Sun, L. Weinert, J. Bednarz, et al. Normal values of regional left ventricular endocardial motion: multicenter color kinesis study Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2464 - H2476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vignon, V. Mor-Avi, L. Weinert, R. Koch, K. T. Spencer, and R. M. Lang Quantitative Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Diastolic Function With Color Kinesis Circulation, March 24, 1998; 97(11): 1053 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Kovacs, J. Rosado, A. L. M. McGuire, and A. F. Hall Can Transmitral Doppler E-Waves Differentiate Hypertensive Hearts From Normal? Hypertension, October 1, 1997; 30(4): 788 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Louie and D. S. Louie New Echocardiographic Technology: Does it Add to Clinical Decision-Making? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 1997; 1(1): 16 - 31. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Popp `High Time' for Noninvasive Assessment of Regional Ventricular Diastolic Ischemic Dysfunction Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 552 - 554. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |