Acute rejection after heart transplantation: noninvasive echocardiographic evaluation

Department of Cardiology, Centro A. De Gasperis, Ospedale Niguarda Ca Granda, Milan, Italy.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of echocardiography in the noninvasive diagnosis of acute rejection in heart transplant recipients. BACKGROUND. Although echocardiographic results seem to correlate well with allograft rejection, published data are limited and contradictory. METHODS. In 130 transplant recipients, 1,400 serial echocardiograms were recorded within 24 h of endomyocardial biopsy. Increased wall thickness, myocardial echogenicity, pericardial effusion, shorter pressure half-time, isovolumetric relaxation time and a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction were considered markers of rejection. RESULTS. The distribution of echocardiographic markers revealed highly significant differences between bioptically graded moderate, mild and no rejection and between untreated and treated rejection episodes (both chi-square test, p < 0.0001). Specificity was 98.6% for two markers, but sensitivity was good (80%) for only moderate rejection because of the large number of false negatives in untreated patients with mild rejection. In untreated patients, there was a highly significant difference in the number of echocardiographic criteria between a benign and nonbenign outcome (chi-square test, p < 0.0001). In treated patients, the significant difference in the variation in echocardiographic criteria between favorable and unfavorable responses after 1 week was more pronounced after 2 weeks (t test, p < 0.01 vs. < 0.001). Diastolic indexes and pericardial effusion at 2 weeks seemed to be predictive of therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS. Poor sensitivity to mild rejection indicates that serial echocardiography cannot supplant endomyocardial biopsy in the early diagnosis of acute rejection, but it seems to be a reliable noninvasive means of identifying acute rejection requiring intensified immunosuppressive therapy and of evaluating outcome.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Estep, D. J. Shah, S. F. Nagueh, J. J. Mahmarian, G. Torre-Amione, and W. A. Zoghbi The Role of Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in the Transplanted Heart J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 1126 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Kondo, K. Ohmori, A. Oshita, H. Takeuchi, J. Yoshida, K. Shinomiya, S. Fuke, T. Suzuki, K. Mizushige, and M. Kohno Leukocyte-Targeted Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Can Assess the Degree of Acute Allograft Rejection in a Rat Cardiac Transplantation Model Circulation, March 2, 2004; 109(8): 1056 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Poston and B. P. Griffith Heart Transplantation J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 3 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Morgan, J. E. Wilson, C. E. MacAulay, N. B. MacKinnon, J. A. Kenyon, P. S. Gerla, C. Dong, H. Zeng, P. D. Whitehead, C. R. Thompson, et al. New Method for Detection of Heart Allograft Rejection : Validation of Sensitivity and Reliability in a Rat Heterotopic Allograft Model Circulation, September 14, 1999; 100(11): 1236 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Angermann, K. Nassau, H.-U. Stempfle, T. M. Kruger, R. Drewello, R. Junge, P. Uberfuhr, M. Wei, and K. Theisen Recognition of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection From Serial Integrated Backscatter Analyses in Human Orthotopic Heart Transplant Recipients: Comparison With Conventional Echocardiography Circulation, January 7, 1997; 95(1): 140 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text]