Emergency coronary stenting for dissection during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: angiographic follow-up after stenting and after repeat angioplasty of the stented segment

I. Medizinische Klinik, Technischen Universitat Munchen, Germany.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to assess the angiographic results after emergency coronary stenting and after repeat angioplasty for restenosis within the stent. BACKGROUND. There is still little angiographic information about lumen renarrowing and its correlates after emergency stenting, and data with regard to the angiographic outcome of repeat angioplasty within the stent are almost nonexistent. METHODS. This study was based on the quantitative evaluation of angiograms performed before and immediately after intervention and at 6-month follow-up. The study included 164 of the 183 eligible patients with emergency Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation and 31 of those with restenosis within the stent who had repeat angioplasty. RESULTS. Stenting produced an improvement in minimal lumen diameter from 0.82 +/- 0.41 to 2.76 +/- 0.47 mm (mean +/- SD) and in diameter stenosis from 74.9 +/- 11.5% to 18.3 +/- 8.1%. Elastic recoil was 0.51 +/- 0.34 mm, or 16%. At 6-month follow-up, 32.3% of the patients had restenosis (> or = 50% stenosis). Minimal lumen diameter decreased to 1.84 +/- 0.78 mm, and diameter stenosis increased to 41.7 +/- 21.0%. The degree of lumen loss correlated significantly with the length of the original stenosis and the initial lumen gain achieved by stenting. Thirty-one patients with in-stent restenosis underwent repeat angioplasty. The primary success rate was 100%, and no abrupt vessel closure was verified. Minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.85 +/- 0.35 to 2.18 +/- 0.39 mm, and diameter stenosis decreased from 69.7 +/- 12.9% to 28.6 +/- 9.4%. Elastic recoil was 0.82 +/- 0.38 mm, or 27%. At follow-up, 38.5% of the patients had restenosis. Minimal lumen diameter was reduced to 1.72 +/- 0.67 mm, and diameter stenosis increased to 42.4 +/- 18.1%. CONCLUSIONS. Angiographic results of emergency coronary stenting compare favorably with those of conventional angioplasty. In-stent balloon redilation in patients with restenosis is associated with excellent short-term results and a restenosis rate not different from that reported for nonstented vessels.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Inoue, T. Uchida, I. Yaguchi, Y. Sakai, K. Takayanagi, and S. Morooka Stent-Induced Expression and Activation of the Leukocyte Integrin Mac-1 Is Associated With Neointimal Thickening and Restenosis Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107(13): 1757 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Di Mario, F Marsico, M Adamian, E Karvouni, R Albiero, and A Colombo New recipes for in-stent restenosis: cut, grate, roast, or sandwich the neointima? Heart, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 471 - 475. [Full Text]

				J. Al Suwaidi, P. B. Berger, and D. R. Holmes Jr Coronary Artery Stents JAMA, October 11, 2000; 284(14): 1828 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Kosa, R. Blasini, J. Schneider-Eicke, T. Dickfeld, F. J. Neumann, S. Ziegler, I. Matsunari, J. Neverve, A. Schomig, and M. Schwaiger Early recovery of coronary flow reserve after stent implantation as assessed by positron emission tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1036 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Kobayashi, J. De Gregorio, N. Kobayashi, T. Akiyama, B. Reimers, L. Finci, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 651 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, M. Seyfarth, W. Koch, S. Elezi, C. Bottiger, J. Mehilli, K. Schomig, and N. von Beckerath PlA Polymorphism of Platelet Glycoprotein IIIa and Risk of Restenosis After Coronary Stent Placement Circulation, March 2, 1999; 99(8): 1005 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Farb, G. Sangiorgi, A. J. Carter, V. M. Walley, W. D. Edwards, R. S. Schwartz, and R. Virmani Pathology of Acute and Chronic Coronary Stenting in Humans Circulation, January 12, 1999; 99(1): 44 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Holmes Jr., J. Hirshfeld Jr., D. Faxon, R. Vlietstra, A. Jacobs, S. B. King III, T. M. Bashore, N. D. Bridges, C. B. Higgins, L. F. Hiratzka, et al. ACC expert consensus document on coronary artery stents: Document of the American College of Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1471 - 1482. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Narins, D. R. Holmes Jr, and E. J. Topol A Call for Provisional Stenting : The Balloon Is Back! Circulation, April 7, 1998; 97(13): 1298 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bauters, J.-L. Banos, E. Van Belle, E. P. Mc Fadden, J.-M. Lablanche, and M. E. Bertrand Six-Month Angiographic Outcome After Successful Repeat Percutaneous Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Circulation, February 3, 1998; 97(4): 318 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gawaz, F.-J. Neumann, I. Ott, A. May, and A. Schomig Platelet Activation and Coronary Stent Implantation: Effect of Antithrombotic Therapy Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 279 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. Ozaki, D. Keane, P. Ruygrok, W. J. van der Giessen, P. de Feyter, and P. W. Serruys Six-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcome of the New, Less Shortening Wallstent in Native Coronary Arteries Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2114 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text]