Early angiographic changes of side branches arising from a Palmaz-Schatz stented coronary segment: results and clinical implications
A Iniguez,
C Macaya,
F Alfonso,
J Goicolea,
R Hernandez,
and
P Zarco
Cardiopulmonary Department, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects and clinical implications of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation on coronary blood flow in side branches arising from a stented coronary artery segment. BACKGROUND. The occlusion of a side branch is a well defined risk after balloon angioplasty. However, the impact of stenting on the coronary flow in side branches arising within the stented segment is unknown. METHODS. Forty-six stented coronary artery segments with 79 side branches emerging from the stented segment were analyzed. Angiographic studies were performed before angioplasty, after balloon dilation, immediately after stenting and 24 h later. Side branches were classified as follows: type A (> or = 1 mm in diameter, with ostial narrowing), type B (> or = 1 mm in diameter, without ostial narrowing), type C (< 1 mm in diameter, with ostial narrowing) and type D (< 1 mm in diameter, without ostial narrowing). Quantitative angiography was used to assess the diameter of the side branches. RESULTS. Stents were implanted electively in lesions with restenosis (41 stents, 89%) or with a suboptimal result after angioplasty (5 stents, 11%). Nine side branches (11%) were type A, 25 (32%) type B, 7 (9%) type C and 38 (48%) type D. At baseline, 68 side branches had Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial flow grade 3; 10 had grade 2; and 1 had grade 1. Flow worsened (TIMI grade > or = 1) in six side branches (8%) after balloon dilation and in four side branches (5%) after stenting. One additional side branch (1%) was occluded at 24 h. Of the 34 side branches > or = 1 mm in diameter (mean diameter 1.5 +/- 0.3 mm), 2 (6%) had flow impairment after stenting. Three patients experienced transient angina, but no acute myocardial infarction occurred as a result of a side branch occlusion. CONCLUSIONS. Coronary artery stenting does not modify anterograde flow in 90% of side branches. Coronary flow is reduced after stenting in a few branches, but this does not appear to have major clinical relevance.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lefevre, J. Ormiston, G. Guagliumi, H.-P. Schultheiss, L. Quilliet, B. Reimers, P. Brunel, W. Wijns, H.J. Buettner, F. Hartmann, et al.
The FRONTIER Stent Registry: Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Dedicated Stent for the Treatment of Bifurcation Coronary Artery Lesions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 16, 2005;
46(4):
592 - 598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Y. L. Zee, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, C. Macaya, E. Pintor, K. Lindpaintner, and A. Fernandez-Cruz
ACE D/I Polymorphism and Incidence of Post-PTCA Restenosis : A Prospective, Angiography-Based Evaluation
Hypertension,
March 1, 2001;
37(3):
851 - 855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Alfonso, C. Hernandez, M. J. Perez-Vizcayno, R. Hernandez, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, J. Escaned, C. Banuelos, M. Sabate, M. Sanmartin, C. Fernandez, et al.
Fate of stent-related side branches after coronary intervention in patients with in-stent restenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 1, 2000;
36(5):
1549 - 1556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|