JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 23:799-808
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoels, W
Right arrow Articles by el-Sherif, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoels, W
Right arrow Articles by el-Sherif, N

Circus movement atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. Relation of characteristics of the surface electrocardiogram and conduction properties of the reentrant pathway

W Schoels, B Offner, J Brachmann, W Kuebler, and N el-Sherif

Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

OBJECTIVES. This study was designed to elucidate the basis for the electrocardiographic (ECG) appearance of atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. BACKGROUND. During atrial flutter, the surface ECG may show typical F waves or isolated P waves of any polarity. METHODS. Electrocardiographic leads II, III and aVF and epicardial atrial activation maps constructed from 127 simultaneously recorded bipolar electrograms were compared in 20 dogs with sterile pericarditis and inducible atrial flutter. RESULTS. In 10 dogs with F wave atrial flutter, single loop reentry occurred around combined functional/anatomic obstacles that included one or both caval veins and a vertically oriented arc of functional conduction block. In 10 dogs with P wave atrial flutter, a merely functional (n = 4) or combined (n = 6) obstacle involving any atrial vessel and more vertically (n = 5) or more horizontally (n = 5) oriented arcs of block was present. The isoelectric interval between P waves corresponded to the conduction time within the slow zone of the reentrant circuit (96 +/- 27 vs. 100 +/- 24 ms, mean +/- SD). Slow conduction accounted for 65 +/- 8% of the cycle length in P wave atrial flutter, but for only 29 +/- 7% in F wave atrial flutter (p < 0.05). Slow conduction was usually associated with activation of fewer than five epicardial electrodes per 10-ms isochronal interval, reflecting only a small amount of atrial tissue. The polarity of P or F waves was determined by the direction of the major wave front activating the most electrodes per 10-ms isochronal interval, irrespective of whether the right or the left atrium was activated. CONCLUSIONS. The F waves result from reentrant activation at a relatively constant speed around a vertically oriented functional/anatomic obstacle involving one or both caval veins. The P waves occur when the circuit contains a marked area of slow conduction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Yuniadi, C.-T. Tai, K.-T. Lee, B.-H. Huang, Y.-J. Lin, S. Higa, T.-Y. Liu, J.-L. Huang, P.-C. Lee, and S.-A. Chen
A New Electrocardiographic Algorithm to Differentiate Upper Loop Re-Entry From Reverse Typical Atrial Flutter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 2, 2005; 46(3): 524 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Bochoeyer, Y. Yang, J. Cheng, R. J. Lee, E. C. Keung, N. F. Marrouche, A. Natale, and M. M. Scheinman
Surface Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Right and Left Atrial Flutter
Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 60 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L.-M. Rodriguez, C. Timmermans, A. Nabar, L. Hofstra, and H. J.J. Wellens
Biatrial Activation in Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter
Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2545 - 2550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Jais, D. C. Shah, M. Haissaguerre, M. Hocini, J. T. Peng, A. Takahashi, S. Garrigue, P. Le Metayer, and J. Clementy
Mapping and Ablation of Left Atrial Flutters
Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101(25): 2928 - 2934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Becker, R. Klinkott, A. Bauer, J. C. Senges, K. D. Schreiner, F. Voss, W. Kuebler, and W. Schoels
Multisite pacing for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias: potential mechanisms
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1939 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. SippensGroenewegen, M. D. Lesh, F. X. Roithinger, W. S. Ellis, P. R. Steiner, L. A. Saxon, R. J. Lee, and M. M. Scheinman
Body surface mapping of counterclockwise and clockwise typical atrial flutter: a comparative analysis with endocardial activation sequence mapping
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5): 1276 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Uno, K. Kumagai, C. M. Khrestian, and A. L. Waldo
New Insights Regarding the Atrial Flutter Reentrant Circuit : Studies in the Canine Sterile Pericarditis Model
Circulation, September 21, 1999; 100(12): 1354 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.