Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare in random fashion an anatomic and an electrogram mapping approach for ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND. Ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia can be performed by using either an anatomic or an electrogram mapping approach to identify target sites for ablation. These two approaches have never been compared prospectively. METHODS. Fifty consecutive patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia were randomly assigned to undergo either an anatomic or an electrogram mapping approach for ablation of the slow AV node pathway. In 25 patients randomly assigned to the anatomic approach, sequential radiofrequency energy applications were delivered along the tricuspid annulus from the level of the coronary sinus ostium to the His bundle position. In 25 patients assigned to the electrogram mapping approach, target sites along the posteromedial tricuspid annulus near the coronary sinus ostium were sought where there was a multicomponent atrial electrogram or evidence of a possible slow pathway potential. If the initial approach was ineffective after 12 radiofrequency energy applications, the alternative approach was then used. RESULTS. The anatomic approach was effective in 21 (84%) of 25 patients, and the electrogram mapping approach was effective in all 25 patients (100%) randomly assigned to this technique (p = 0.1). The four patients with an ineffective anatomic approach had a successful outcome with the electrogram mapping approach. On the basis of intention to treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the electrogram mapping approach and the anatomic approach with respect to the time required for ablation (28 +/- 21 and 31 +/- 31 min, respectively, mean +/- SD, p = 0.7) duration of fluoroscopic exposure (27 +/- 20 and 27 +/- 18 min, respectively, p = 0.9) or mean number of radiofrequency applications delivered (6.3 +/- 3.9 vs. 7.2 +/- 8.0, p = 0.6). With both the anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches, the atrial electrogram duration and number of peaks in the atrial electrogram were significantly greater at successful target sites than at unsuccessful target sites. CONCLUSIONS. The anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches for ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway are comparable in efficacy and duration. If the anatomic approach is initially attempted and fails, the electrogram mapping approach may be successful at sites outside the areas targeted in the anatomic approach. With both the anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches, there are significant differences in the atrial electrogram configuration between successful and unsuccessful target sites.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Y. Chan, N. S. Mok, C. L. Lau, Y. K. Lo, C. C. Choy, S. T. Lau, and Y. C. Choi Treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by cryoablation with a 6 mm-tip catheter vs. radiofrequency ablation Europace, August 1, 2009; 11(8): 1065 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. De Sisti, J. Tonet, F. Gueffaf, F. Touil, J.-F. Leclercq, P. Aouate, J. Lacotte, F. Hidden-Lucet, and R. Frank Effects of inadvertent atrioventricular block on clinical outcomes during cryoablation of the slow pathway in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Europace, December 1, 2008; 10(12): 1421 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374. [Full Text]

				H. Nakagawa and W. M. Jackman Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2465 - 2478. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Katritsis, K. A. Ellenbogen, A. E. Becker, and A. J. Camm Retrograde slow pathway conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 458 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. De Sisti, J. Tonet, N. Barakett, J. Lacotte, J.F. Leclercq, and R. Frank Transvenous cryo-ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a single-centre initial experience study Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 401 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Zrenner, J. Dong, J. Schreieck, I. Deisenhofer, H. Estner, B. Luani, M. Karch, and C. Schmitt Transvenous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a prospective randomized pilot study Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2004; 25(24): 2226 - 2231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Dagres, J. R. Clague, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe Significant gender-related differences in radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1103 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Kopelman, S. P. Prater, F. Tondato, N. A. F. Chronos, and N. S. Peters Slow pathway catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia guided by electroanatomical mapping: a randomized comparison to the conventional approach Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(2): 171 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270. [Full Text]

				P. Weismuller, S. Kuly, B. Brandts, K. Kattenbeck, C. Ranke, and H. J. Trappe Is electrical stimulation during administration of catecholamines required for the evaluation of success after ablation of atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardias? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 20, 2002; 39(4): 689 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Willems, C. Weiss, M. Shenasa, R. Ventura, M. Hoffmann, and T. Meinertz Optimized mapping of slow pathway ablation guided by subthreshold stimulation: a randomized prospective study in patients with recurrent atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1645 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.R. Clague, N. Dagres, H. Kottkamp, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe Targeting the slow pathway for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: initial results and long-term follow-up in 379 consecutive patients Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2001; 22(1): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y.-G. Li, G. Gronefeld, B. Bender, C. Machura, and S.H. Hohnloser Risk of development of delayed atrioventricular block after slow pathway modification in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a pre-existing prolonged PR interval Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2001; 22(1): 89 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Morady Radio-Frequency Ablation as Treatment for Cardiac Arrhythmias N. Engl. J. Med., February 18, 1999; 340(7): 534 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Calkins, P. Yong, J. M. Miller, B. Olshansky, M. Carlson, J. P. Saul, S. K. S. Huang, L. B. Liem, L. S. Klein, S. A. Moser, et al. Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia, and the Atrioventricular Junction : Final Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial Circulation, January 19, 1999; 99(2): 262 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-H. Hsieh, S.-A. Chen, C.-T. Tai, W.-C. Yu, Y.-J. Chen, and M.-S. Chang Absence of Junctional Rhythm During Successful Slow-Pathway Ablation in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, November 24, 1998; 98(21): 2296 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Medkour, A. E. Becker, K. Khalife, and J. Billette Anatomic and Functional Characteristics of a Slow Posterior AV Nodal Pathway : Role in Dual-Pathway Physiology and Reentry Circulation, July 14, 1998; 98(2): 164 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F GAITA, R RICCARDI, and L CALO Importance and implications of the occurrence of AV block following radiofrequency ablation Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 534 - 535. [Full Text]

				W. G. Fisher, M. A. Pelini, and M. E. Bacon Adjunctive Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Slow Pathway Ablation in Human Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia : Anatomic Insights Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3021 - 3029. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Kreiner, G. Heinz, P. Siostrzonek, and H. D. Gossinger Effect of Slow Pathway Ablation on Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation : Dependence on Electrophysiological Properties of the Fast Pathway Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. J. Niebauer, E. Daoud, B. Williamson, K. C. Man, A. Strickberger, J. Hummel, and F. Morady Atrial Electrogram Characteristics in Patients With and Without Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 77 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. D. Williamson, K. C. Man, E. Daoud, M. Niebauer, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of Atrioventricular Conduction to Control the Ventricular Rate during Atrial Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., October 6, 1994; 331(14): 910 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text]