Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 23:317-322
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Exner, D
Right arrow Articles by Mehra, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Exner, D
Right arrow Articles by Mehra, R

Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system

D Exner, R Yee, DL Jones, GJ Klein, and R Mehra

Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

OBJECTIVES. We hypothesized that combining biphasic waveform and sequential pulse defibrillation techniques would lower the defibrillation threshold of a nonthoracotomy lead system in humans below that obtained with biphasic or sequential pulse defibrillation alone. BACKGROUND. Previous studies have shown that sequential pulse monophasic shocks and biphasic waveform shocks are more effective than single monophasic shocks for ventricular defibrillation. METHODS. Thirteen patients aged 48 to 71 years undergoing nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead testing participated in the study. Transvenous electrodes were positioned in the right ventricular apex, superior vena cava and coronary sinus. A cutaneous patch electrode was placed on the left chest wall. All electrodes were connected to an external defibrillator. In random order, defibrillation threshold measurements were made for biphasic defibrillation alone, sequential defibrillation alone and combined biphasic plus sequential defibrillation. RESULTS. The mean defibrillation threshold-delivered energy was 18.0 +/- 11.9 J for biphasic defibrillation and 16.3 +/- 9.0 J for sequential defibrillation. Biphasic plus sequential defibrillation significantly reduced the threshold energy to 10.2 +/- 5.3 J (p < 0.001). Threshold peak voltage and current values showed corresponding reductions. The combined waveform resulted in a greater reduction in defibrillation threshold in patients with threshold energies > 18 J versus those with threshold values < or = 18 J for sequential (p = 0.001) or biphasic (p < 0.01) waveform alone. The nonthoracotomy lead implantation rate was improved from 62% with each of the single techniques (biphasic waveform or sequential pulse defibrillation) to 85% with the combined waveform. CONCLUSIONS. Adding biphasic waveform to sequential pulse defibrillation significantly reduced the defibrillation threshold compared with either technique alone, and nonthoracotomy lead system implantation can be enhanced by this combined technique.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Butter, E. Meisel, J. Tebbenjohanns, L. Engelmann, E. Fleck, B. Schubert, S. Hahn, and D. Pfeiffer
Transvenous Biventricular Defibrillation Halves Energy Requirements in Patients
Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2533 - 2538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement