Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994; 23:27-34
© 1994 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Condorelli, M
Right arrow Articles by Brusoni, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Condorelli, M
Right arrow Articles by Brusoni, B

IPO-V2: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, comparative clinical investigation of the effects of sulodexide in preventing cardiovascular accidents in the first year after acute myocardial infarction

M Condorelli, M Chiariello, A Dagianti, M Penco, S Dalla Volta, V Pengo, L Schivazappa, G Mattioli, AV Mattioli, B Brusoni, et al.

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.

OBJECTIVES. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of sulodexide, a glycosaminoglycan compound with antithrombotic properties, in preventing death and thromboembolic events after acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND. Antithrombotic therapy has been found to play an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular events and death after acute myocardial infarction. Glycosaminoglycan-containing compounds, including sulodexide, show profibrinolytic and antithrombotic properties that render them suitable for use in patients after infarction. METHODS. A total of 3,986 patients who had recovered from acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive either the standard therapy routinely administered at each study center, excluding antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs (control group, 1,970 patients), or the standard therapy plus sulodexide (treated group, 2,016 patients). Between 7 and 10 days after the episode of acute myocardial infarction, sulodexide was administered as a single daily 600-lipoprotein-lipase-releasing unit (LRU) intramuscular injection for the 1st month, followed by oral capsules of 500 LRU twice daily. Patients were evaluated for > or = 12 months. RESULTS. At the end of the study, 140 deaths (7.1%) were recorded in the control group and 97 (4.8%) in the sulodexide group (32% risk reduction, p = 0.0022, chi-square test). A total of 90 patients (4.6%) in the control group had a further infarction, compared with 66 (3.3%) in the sulodexide group (28% risk reduction, p = 0.035). Furthermore, a reduction in left ventricular thrombus formation (evaluated by echocardiography) was observed in the sulodexide group (n = 12; 0.6%), compared with values in the control group (n = 25; 1.3%) (53% risk reduction, p = 0.027). Sulodexide was well tolerated and devoid of significant adverse events. All significant results were confirmed by "actual treatment" analyses. CONCLUSIONS. The study provides evidence that long-term therapy with sulodexide started early after an episode of acute myocardial infarction is associated with reductions in total mortality, rate of reinfarction and mural thrombus formation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. L. Heerspink, T. Greene, J. B. Lewis, I. Raz, R. D. Rohde, L. G. Hunsicker, S. L. Schwartz, S. Aronoff, M. A. Katz, G. M. Eisner, et al.
Effects of sulodexide in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent albuminuria
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1946 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. L. Cirujeda and P. C. Granado
A Study on the Safety, Efficacy, and Efficiency of Sulodexide Compared with Acenocoumarol in Secondary Prophylaxis in Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis
Angiology, January 1, 2006; 57(1): 53 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. M. Errichi, M. R. Cesarone, G. Belcaro, R. Marinucci, A. Ricci, A. Ippolito, R. Brandolini, G. Vinciguerra, M. Dugall, A. Felicita, et al.
Prevention of Recurrent Deep Venous Thrombosis with Sulodexide: The SanVal Registry
Angiology, May 1, 2004; 55(3): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Bounameaux
Intermittent claudication: how should we react to this symptom?
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2002; 23(13): 1002 - 1004.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Coccheri, G. Scondotto, G. Agnelli, E. Palazzini, and V. Zamboni
Sulodexide in the treatment of intermittent claudication. Results of a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2002; 23(13): 1057 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. Gambaro, I. Kinalska, A. Oksa, P. Pont'uch, M. Hertlova, J. Olsovsky, J. Manitius, D. Fedele, S. Czekalski, J. Perusicova, et al.
Oral Sulodexide Reduces Albuminuria in Microalbuminuric and Macroalbuminuric Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Di.N.A.S. Randomized Trial
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2002; 13(6): 1615 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Pinto, S. Corrao, D. Galati, S. Arnone, A. Licata, G. Parrinello, T. Maniscalchi, G. Licata, and A. Pinto
Sulodexide Versus Calcium Heparin in the Medium-Term Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Limbs
Angiology, September 1, 1997; 48(9): 805 - 811.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement