Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of respiratory variations in pulmonary venous flow

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to test the utility of measuring respiratory variation in pulmonary venous flow by transesophageal echocardiography. BACKGROUND. Respiratory variation of atrioventricular and central venous flow velocities by Doppler echocardiography has been used to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. METHODS. We performed pulsed wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography of the left or right pulmonary veins in 31 patients with diastolic dysfunction. Fourteen patients had constrictive pericarditis, and 17 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We measured the pulmonary venous peak systolic and diastolic flow velocities and the systolic/diastolic flow ratio with transesophageal echocardiography during expiration and inspiration. The percent change in Doppler flow velocity from expiration to inspiration (%E) was calculated. RESULTS. Pulmonary venous peak systolic flow in both inspiration and expiration was greater in constrictive pericarditis than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. The %E for peak systolic flow tended to be higher in constrictive pericarditis (19% vs. 10%, p = 0.09). In contrast, pulmonary venous peak diastolic flow during inspiration was lower in constrictive pericarditis than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. The %E for peak diastolic flow was larger in constrictive pericarditis (29% vs. 16%, p = 0.008). The pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio was greater in constrictive pericarditis in both inspiration and expiration. The combination of pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio > or = 0.65 in inspiration and a %E for peak diastolic flow > or = 40% correctly classified 86% of patients with constrictive pericarditis. CONCLUSIONS. The relatively larger pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio and greater respiratory variation in pulmonary venous systolic, and especially diastolic, flow velocities by transesophageal echocardiography can be useful signs in distinguishing constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Yamada, T. Tabata, S. J. Jaffer, J. K. Drinko, S. E. Jasper, M. S. Lauer, J. D. Thomas, and A. L. Klein Clinical features of mixed physiology of constriction and restriction: Echocardiographic characteristics and clinical outcome Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2007; 8(3): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tabata, J. D. Thomas, and A. L. Klein Pulmonary venous flow by doppler echocardiography: revisited 12 years later J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 16, 2003; 41(8): 1243 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tabata, S. S. Kabbani, R. D. Murray, J. D. Thomas, I. Abdalla, and A. L. Klein Difference in the respiratory variation between pulmonary venous and mitral inflow doppler velocities in patients with constrictive pericarditis with and without atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1936 - 1942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Skubas, M. Beardslee, B. Barzilai, M. Pasque, M. Kattapuram, and D. G. Lappas Constrictive Pericarditis: Intraoperative Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Evaluation of Cardiac Filling Dynamics Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1424 - 1426. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bollmann, K.-H. Binias, F. Grothues, K. Sonne, H.-D. Esperer, P. Nikutta, and H. U. Klein Left Atrial Appendage Flow in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation : Relationship With Pulmonary Venous Flow and ECG Fibrillatory Wave Amplitude Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 485 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Palka, A. Lange, J. E. Donnelly, and P. Nihoyannopoulos Differentiation Between Restrictive Cardiomyopathy and Constrictive Pericarditis by Early Diastolic Doppler Myocardial Velocity Gradient at the Posterior Wall Circulation, August 8, 2000; 102(6): 655 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D Lowe, A. A Harcombe, A. A Grace, and M. C Petch Lesson of the week: Restrictive-constrictive heart failure masquerading as liver disease BMJ, February 27, 1999; 318(7183): 585 - 586. [Full Text]

				T. Akasaka, K. Yoshida, A. Yamamuro, T. Hozumi, T. Takagi, S. Morioka, and J. Yoshikawa Phasic Coronary Flow Characteristics in Patients With Constrictive Pericarditis : Comparison With Restrictive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1874 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. S. Kushwaha, J. T. Fallon, and V. Fuster Restrictive Cardiomyopathy N. Engl. J. Med., January 23, 1997; 336(4): 267 - 276. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Waggoner and C. A. Baumann Importance of Recording Pulmonary Venous Flow Velocities With Transthoracic or Transesophagea1 Echocartiography: Clinical Application in Various Cardicac Conditions Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, January 1, 1997; 13(1): 3 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. F. Nagueh, H. A. Kopelen, and W. A. Zoghbi Relation of Mean Right Atrial Pressure to Echocardiographic and Doppler Parameters of Right Atrial and Right Ventricular Function Circulation, March 15, 1996; 93(6): 1160 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text]