Comparison of symptom-limited and low level exercise tolerance tests early after myocardial infarction

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio 78284.

OBJECTIVES. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic yield and risks of a symptom-limited treadmill exercise test before hospital discharge. BACKGROUND. Currently, predischarge low level and 6-week symptom-limited exercise treadmill tests are recommended for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. However, few data exist on the safety and value of a predischarge symptom-limited exercise test. METHODS. We utilized a modified Bruce protocol starting at 1.7 mph and 0 grade with 3-min stages in 150 consecutive patients 6.4 +/- 3.1 days after myocardial infarction. Each exercise test was interpreted for duration, symptoms and ST segment changes at the low level (70% of predicted heart rate) and symptom-limited end point. RESULTS. There were no complications related to the symptom-limited exercise tests. The test results were positive in only 23% of the patients at the low level end point, but were positive in 40% of the patients at the later symptom-limited end point (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 15 +/- 5 months in 138 patients (92%), 50 patients (36%) had a cardiac event. Of the patients with a cardiac event, significantly more (p < 0.001) had a positive exercise test at the symptom-limited end point (31 vs. 16 patients). Five patients with a negative and 14 patients with a nondiagnostic symptom-limited exercise test had an event. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction, we demonstrated the safety of an early symptom-limited treadmill exercise test. Symptom-limited exercise tests will identify more patients with inducible ischemia who are at risk of future cardiac events and who may benefit from early intervention.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A M Varnava, J E C Sedgwick, A Deaner, K Ranjadayalan, and A D Timmis Restricted weekend service inappropriately delays discharge after acute myocardial infarction Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 216 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Tavel Stress Testing in Cardiac Evaluation : Current Concepts With Emphasis on the ECG Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 907 - 925. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Dominguez, C Torp-Pedersen, L Koeber, and C Rask-Madsen Prognostic value of exercise testing in a cohort of patients followed for 15 years after acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2001; 22(4): 300 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. Newby, E. L. Eisenstein, R. M. Califf, T. D. Thompson, C. L. Nelson, E. D. Peterson, P. W. Armstrong, F. Van de Werf, H. D. White, E. J. Topol, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Early Discharge after Uncomplicated Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., March 16, 2000; 342(11): 749 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Safstrom and E Swahn Early symptom-limited exercise test for risk stratification in post menopausal women with unstable coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2000; 21(3): 230 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]