Feasibility of early discharge after acute Q wave myocardial infarction in patients not receiving thrombolytic treatment
G Sanz,
A Betriu,
G Oller,
M Matas,
J Magrina,
C Pare,
E Roig,
M Heras,
M Azqueta,
X Bosch,
et al.
Cardiac Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to analyze the feasibility of early discharge (4 days) after acute myocardial infarction in patients not receiving thrombolytic therapy by first identifying predictors of short-term prognosis and then testing the derived risk profile in an independent cohort of patients. BACKGROUND. Previous studies have shown that early discharge after acute myocardial infarction is possible. However, physicians are reluctant to shorten the standard 7- to 10-day hospital stay, presumably because of difficulty in selecting low risk patients. METHODS. From January 1985 to November 1986, 358 patients with acute myocardial infarction who did not receive thrombolytic therapy were screened. Those with a Q-wave infarction showing no complications on day 4 were considered candidates for early discharge and were transferred to the ward for a mean of 12 days. During this period, we looked for any event (cardiac or noncardiac) that would have prompted readmission if the patient had been previously discharged. Univariate and multiple regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of these events among 25 baseline variables. The derived risk profile was tested in an independent validation cohort. RESULTS. One hundred five (29.3%) of the 358 patients were free of symptoms on day 4, and 29 (27.6%) had at least one cardiac event, including four deaths and one reinfarction. Multivariate analysis selected diabetes, ejection fraction < 40% and age as independent predictors of events. Using the risk profile, 18 (13.2%) of the 136 validation cohort patients were categorized as low risk, and only 1 of them had a major event (progressive angina). Sensitivity for the risk profile was high (91%), but specificity was low (34%). CONCLUSIONS. The use of simple clinical variables may allow the safe reduction of hospital stay after infarction in selected patients. However because the proportion of candidates for early discharge is small (12.6%), it seems unlikely that the current policies on length of hospital stay will change in the near future.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Spencer, D. Lessard, J. M. Gore, J. Yarzebski, and R. J. Goldberg
Declining Length of Hospital Stay for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Postdischarge Outcomes: A Community-Wide Perspective
Arch Intern Med,
April 12, 2004;
164(7):
733 - 740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Desideri, P. M. Fioretti, L. Cortigiani, D. Gregori, C. Coletta, C. Vigna, F. Tota, R. Rambaldi, J. Bax, L. Celegon, et al.
Cost of strategies after myocardial infarction (COSTAMI): A multicentre, international, randomized trial for cost-effective discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2003;
24(18):
1630 - 1639.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.K Newby, V Hasselblad, P.W Armstrong, F Van de Werf, D.B Mark, H.D White, E.J Topol, and R.M Califf
Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making
Eur. Heart J.,
January 2, 2003;
24(2):
182 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bogaty, S. Dumont, G. E. O'Hara, L. Boyer, L. Auclair, J. Jobin, and J.-R. Boudreault
Randomized trial of a noninvasive strategy to reduce hospital stay for patients with low-risk myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 1, 2001;
37(5):
1289 - 1296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.M van der Vlugt, H Boersma, C.M Leenders, G.A.M Pop, M.J Veerhoek, M.L Simoons, and J.W Deckers
Prospective study of early discharge after acute myocardial infarction (SHORT)
Eur. Heart J.,
June 2, 2000;
21(12):
992 - 999.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Kucenic, D. G. Meyers, and D. G. Meyers
Impact of a Clinical Pathway on the Care and Costs of Myocardial Infarction
Angiology,
May 1, 2000;
51(5):
393 - 404.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. K. Newby, E. L. Eisenstein, R. M. Califf, T. D. Thompson, C. L. Nelson, E. D. Peterson, P. W. Armstrong, F. Van de Werf, H. D. White, E. J. Topol, et al.
Cost Effectiveness of Early Discharge after Uncomplicated Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med.,
March 16, 2000;
342(11):
749 - 755.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. J. Senaratne, M. E. Irwin, S. Shaben, J. Griffiths, J. Nagendran, L. Kasza, S. Gulamhusein, and M. Haughian
Feasibility of direct discharge from the coronary/intermediate care unit after acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 15, 1999;
33(4):
1040 - 1046.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|