Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 22:1317-1319
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olson, H.

Bedside cardiology and thrombolysis

HG Olson

The study by Christian et al. (37) provides useful clinical information for the management of the patient with myocardial infarction with thrombolytic therapy. 1) Complete resolution of chest pain during the infusion of an intravenous thrombolytic agent suggests reperfusion and myocardial salvage. Initial conservative medical management should be considered in these patients especially if serial ECGs show a progressive and rapid downward defection of the ST segment. 2) Patients presenting within 6 h after the onset of infarction, who are pain free, may still benefit from thrombolysis if their ECGs show persistent ischemia. 3) In the remaining patients in whom chest pain does not resolve completely during thrombolytic therapy, management, whether continued medical or invasive strategy, should be individualized and dictated by the extent of myocardium at risk (i.e., by the number of ECG leads showing ST segment elevation), the response of the ST segment to thrombolysis and, most important, the clinical status of the patient.




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement