JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 22:741-745
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh-Yellin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh-Yellin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M.

Safety and efficacy of central intravenous bolus administration of adenosine for termination of supraventricular tachycardia

NL McIntosh-Yellin, BJ Drew, and MM Scheinman

Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.

OBJECTIVES. This study was done to quantify the dosing differences between central and peripheral adenosine administration for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. BACKGROUND. Earlier studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of adenosine primarily utilized a peripheral site of administration. Although it has been recommended that lower doses should be given centrally, dosing recommendations have not been provided. METHODS. Thirty adults with supraventricular tachycardia underwent invasive electrophysiologic study and were treated with central and peripheral intravenous administration of adenosine. Peripheral injections were administered through a venous catheter in an upper extremity and central infusions were accomplished by means of a catheter positioned in or near the right atrium. The site of administration was randomized and each subject received adenosine by both routes. Adenosine was administered every minute in increasing increments of 3, 6, 9 and 12 mg until the tachycardia terminated. Peripheral responses were compared with those obtained centrally. RESULTS. The minimal effective peripheral dose was distributed among the four doses: Tachycardia was terminated in 11 patients with 3 mg (37%), in 10 (33%) with 6 mg, in 4 (13%) with 9 mg and in 5 (17%) with 12 mg. In contrast, after central administration, 23 episodes of tachycardia (77%) were terminated with 3 mg, 6 (20%) with 6 mg and 1 (3%) with 9 mg; none required 12 mg. Lower doses of adenosine were more effective after central than after peripheral administration, with 63% of the subjects requiring a lesser dose. There was no difference between the two routes of drug administration in the incidence of side effects or transient arrhythmias at the time of tachycardia termination. CONCLUSIONS. Adenosine can be safely given centrally for termination of supraventricular tachycardia. The initial dose should be 3 mg.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
G A Ng, W Martin, and A C Rankin
Imaging of adenosine bolus transit following intravenous administration: insights into antiarrhythmic efficacy
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. A. Glatter, J. Cheng, P. Dorostkar, G. Modin, S. Talwar, M. Al-Nimri, R. J. Lee, L. A. Saxon, M. D. Lesh, and M. M. Scheinman
Electrophysiologic Effects of Adenosine in Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia
Circulation, March 2, 1999; 99(8): 1034 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
E Jaeggi, J C Fouron, A Fournier, N van Doesburg, S P Drblik, and F Proulx
Ventriculo-atrial time interval measured on M mode echocardiography: a determining element in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of fetal supraventricular tachycardia
Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 582 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.