Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current

Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this prospective study was to test the hypothesis that the elimination of inducible repetitive atrioventricular (AV) node reentry despite the persistence of slow AV pathway conduction is a valid end point for radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures in patients with supraventricular tachycardia due to AV node reentry. BACKGROUND. Although modification of AV node physiology by radiofrequency current can eliminate AV node reentrant tachycardia, therapeutic end points that are definitive of a satisfactory result in patients undergoing modification of the slow AV pathway have not been established. Applications of radiofrequency current at selected sites may eliminate all evidence of slow pathway conduction or sufficiently modify the refractory properties of the slow pathway to preclude sustained arrhythmias. Accordingly, total abolition of dual AV node physiology may not be necessary to prevent arrhythmia recurrence. METHODS. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV pathway was attempted in 59 patients with typical AV node reentry. Tissue ablation was performed with a continuous wave of 500-kHz radiofrequency current. Twenty-five to 35 W was applied for 60 s at the site selected for tissue destruction. RESULTS. Dual AV node physiology was eliminated completely in 35 patients (59%), persisted without inducible AV node reentry in 13 patients (22%) and persisted with inducible single AV reentrant beats in 11 patients (19%). In patients with persistent dual AV node physiology, the maximal difference between the effective refractory period of the fast and slow pathways was reduced from 104 +/- 62 ms before the procedure to 37 +/- 37 ms after AV conduction had been modified (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up interval of 15 months (range 4 to 28), only one patient (2%) had a recurrence of the tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS. Results demonstrate that when complete elimination of dual AV node physiology is difficult, modification of slow pathway conduction to the extent that repetitive AV node reentry cannot be induced is a definitive end point that portends a good prognosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Khairy, P. G. Novak, P. G. Guerra, I. Greiss, L. Macle, D. Roy, M. Talajic, B. Thibault, and M. Dubuc Cryothermal slow pathway modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 909 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Loh and G Breithardt 'Slow pathway' ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: do we understand what we are doing? Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2001; 22(1): 19 - 21. [PDF]

				C.-T. Kuo, K.-H. Lin, N.-J. Cheng, P.-H. Chu, T.-S. Hsu, C.-W. Chiang, and Y.-S. Lee Characterization of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry With Continuous Atrioventricular Node Conduction Curve by Double Atrial Extrastimulation Circulation, February 9, 1999; 99(5): 659 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Fisher, M. A. Pelini, and M. E. Bacon Adjunctive Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Slow Pathway Ablation in Human Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia : Anatomic Insights Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3021 - 3029. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. J. Lessmeier, D. Gamperling, V. Johnson-Liddon, B. S. Fromm, R. T. Steinman, M. D. Meissner, and M. H. Lehmann Unrecognized Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia: Potential for Misdiagnosis as Panic Disorder Arch Intern Med, March 10, 1997; 157(5): 537 - 543. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. E. Epstein, W. M. Miles, D. G. Benditt, A. J. Camm, E. J. Darling, P. L. Friedman, A. Garson, J. C. Harvey, G. A. Kidwell, G. J. Klein, et al. Personal and Public Safety Issues Related to Arrhythmias That May Affect Consciousness: Implications for Regulation and Physician Recommendations: A Medical/Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 1147 - 1166. [Full Text]

				R. G. Sheahan, G. J. Klein, R. Yee, C. A. Le Feuvre, and A. D. Krahn Atrioventricular Node Reentry With `Smooth' AV Node Function Curves : A Different Arrhythmia Substrate? Circulation, March 1, 1996; 93(5): 969 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Kreiner, G. Heinz, P. Siostrzonek, and H. D. Gossinger Effect of Slow Pathway Ablation on Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation : Dependence on Electrophysiological Properties of the Fast Pathway Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. C. Doig, J. Saito, L. Harris, and E. Downar Coronary Sinus Morphology in Patients With Atrioventricular Junctional Reentry Tachycardia and Other Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias Circulation, August 1, 1995; 92(3): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. J. Niebauer, E. Daoud, B. Williamson, K. C. Man, A. Strickberger, J. Hummel, and F. Morady Atrial Electrogram Characteristics in Patients With and Without Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 77 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text]