Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 22:569-574
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, R
Right arrow Articles by Garan, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, R
Right arrow Articles by Garan, H

Successful implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator systems in patients with elevated defibrillation thresholds

R Brooks, D Torchiana, GJ Vlahakes, JN Ruskin, BA McGovern, and H Garan

Harvard Medical School, Cardiac Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

OBJECTIVES:.The purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of 16 patients with high initial defibrillation thresholds in whom a three-electrode system was used to lower defibrillation thresholds and permit implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator system. BACKGROUND. Patients with high defibrillation thresholds (> 25 J) are uncommon but may be problematic to physicians implanting cardioverter-defibrillator systems. Most conventional systems use two defibrillating electrodes, most commonly two epicardial patches. When defibrillation thresholds remain elevated despite extensive testing of a two-electrode system, a third electrode can be incorporated and tested. However, few published data exist on the use of a three-electrode system in patients with high defibrillation thresholds. METHODS. After failure to achieve satisfactory defibrillation thresholds < 25 J with a two-patch electrode system, a third electrode was incorporated and tested. In all cases, two electrodes were joined to form a common cathode or anode, while a single electrode was used as the opposite polarity electrode. Various three-electrode configurations were then tested. RESULTS. In all 16 patients, satisfactory defibrillation thresholds were achieved and a cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0% to 21%). The mean final defibrillation threshold using the revised three-electrode system was 19.5 +/- 3.7 J (p < 0.0001). A mean of 6 +/- 3 electrode configurations/patient were tested before the final configuration was selected. A total of nine different electrode configurations were used in the 16 study patients; the most common of these incorporated left and right ventricular patches as combined cathode and a superior vena cava coil (n = 5) or right atrial patch electrode (n = 3) as single anode. CONCLUSION. Patients with high initial defibrillation thresholds can generally undergo successful cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with a three-electrode system if enough electrode configurations are tested after a third electrode is incorporated.




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement