Comparison of the retrograde and transseptal methods for ablation of left free wall accessory pathways

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0214.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to compare success rates, procedure and fluoroscopy times and complications for the transseptal and retrograde aortic approaches in a consecutive series of patients undergoing catheter ablation of left free wall accessory pathways. BACKGROUND. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways can be performed either by a retrograde, transaortic approach or by means of a transseptal puncture. METHODS. A total of 106 patients (mean age 33 years, range 4 to 79) underwent attempted catheter ablation of a single left-sided accessory pathway by either the retrograde or the transseptal approach, or both. In the first 65 patients, the retrograde aortic approach was the preferred initial method. In the most recent 51 patients, we first attempted the transseptal approach whenever a physician trained in the technique was available. Ultimately, 102 (96.2%) of 106 patients had successful ablation. RESULTS. Of 89 retrograde procedures, 85% resulted in elimination of accessory pathway conduction. Four retrograde procedures performed after failure of the transseptal approach were successful. Of the 13 patients with a failed retrograde procedure, 11 later underwent ablation using the transseptal approach. Twenty-six (85%) of 33 transseptal procedures were successful. All four patients with unsuccessful initial transseptal attempts were successfully treated with the retrograde method during the same session in the electrophysiology laboratory. Ten of 11 transseptal procedures after unsuccessful retrograde procedures were successful. Crossover from the retrograde to the transseptal approach was performed during a separate session in 9 of these 11. There was no difference in total procedure time (220 +/- 12.8 vs. 205 +/- 12.5 min) (mean +/- SEM) or fluoroscopy time (44.1 +/- 4.4 vs. 44.7 +/- 5.1 min) between the retrograde and transseptal methods. Ablation time was longer for the retrograde method (69.2 +/- 10.5 vs. 43.4 +/- 9.3 min) (p < 0.01). Of patients > or = 65 or < or = 16 years old, technical factors requiring crossover to the other technique or complications occurred in 7 (42%) of 17 patients undergoing the retrograde and 1 (11%) of 9 patients undergoing the transseptal approach (p < 0.01). The overall rate of complications was the same for both (6.7% for retrograde and 6.1% for transseptal). The most serious complication involved dissection of the left coronary artery with myocardial infarction during a retrograde procedure. CONCLUSIONS. The retrograde and transseptal approaches are complementary; if one method fails, the other should be attempted, yielding an overall success rate close to 100%. Because patients undergo heparinization immediately after the arterial system is entered during a retrograde procedure, failure of that approach requires crossover to the transseptal method during a separate session or reversal of heparin; if the transseptal method is tried first, crossover to the retrograde approach can be accomplished easily during the same session. To avoid complications related to access, the transseptal method should be the first used in children, the elderly and those with arterial disease or hypertrophic ventricles.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J Earley How to perform a transseptal puncture Heart, January 1, 2009; 95(1): 85 - 92. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Showkathali, M. J. Earley, D. Gupta, M. Alzetani, S. Harris, P. M. Kistler, S. C. Sporton, and R. J. Schilling Current case mix and results of catheter ablation of regular supraventricular tachycardia: are we giving unrealistic expectations to patients? Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1064 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, M. A. Creager, D. R. Holmes Jr, G. Merli, G. P. Rodgers, C. M. Tracy, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2006 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1503 - 1517. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Committee Members, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, M. M. Scheinman, E. M. Aliot, J. S. Alpert, H. Calkins, A. J. Camm, W. B. Campbell, D. E. Haines, K. H. Kuck, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias --executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) Developed in Collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1493 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, M. M. Scheinman, E. M. Aliot, J. S. Alpert, H. Calkins, A. J. Camm, W. B. Campbell, D. E. Haines, K. H. Kuck, B. B. Lerman, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias*--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias) Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1871 - 1909. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Committee Members, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, M. M Scheinman, E. M Aliot, J. S Alpert, H. Calkins, A.J. Camm, W.B. Campbell, D. E Haines, K. H Kuck, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias--executive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American HeartAssociation Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines(Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias)Developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2003; 24(20): 1857 - 1897. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Szili-Torok, G. Kimman, D Theuns, J Res, J R T C Roelandt, and L J Jordaens Transseptal left heart catheterisation guided by intracardiac echocardiography Heart, November 1, 2001; 86(5): e11 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Frey, G. Kreiner, M. Gwechenberger, and H. D. Gossinger Ablation of atrial tachycardia originating from the vicinity of the atrioventricular node: significance of mapping both sides of the interatrial septum J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 394 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Calkins ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias Heart, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 594 - 600. [Full Text]

				H. Calkins Catheter ablation of accessory pathways is associated with an excellent long-term prognosis Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2001; 22(7): 532 - 533. [PDF]

				H. Bertram, R. Bokenkamp, M. Peuster, G. Hausdorf, and T. Paul Coronary Artery Stenosis After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Accessory Atrioventricular Pathways in Children With Ebstein's Malformation Circulation, January 30, 2001; 103(4): 538 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on invasive electrophysiology studies, catheter ablation, and cardioversion: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association/american college of physicians-american society of internal medicine task force on clinical competence J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1725 - 1736. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2309 - 2320. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Dagres, J.R. Clague, H. Kottkamp, G. Hindricks, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways. Outcome and use of antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1826 - 1832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A Olsson, B Darpö, L Bergfeldt, and M Rosenqvist Frequency and long term follow up of valvar insufficiency caused by retrograde aortic radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures Heart, March 1, 1999; 81(3): 292 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N J Linker and A P Fitzpatrick The transseptal approach for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: experience of 104 procedures Heart, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 379 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. B. Wagshal, L. A. Pires, and S. K. Stephen Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias With Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Arch Intern Med, January 23, 1995; 155(2): 137 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]