Randomized trial of direct coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

Unicor Hospital, Interventional Cardiology, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to obtain preliminary data on the relative clinical utility of direct coronary angioplasty compared with that of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND. The relative merits of intravenous thrombolytic therapy and direct coronary angioplasty as treatment for acute myocardial infarction are incompletely understood, and randomized trials of these treatments have been extremely limited. METHODS. One hundred patients with ST segment elevation presenting to a single high volume interventional center within 6 h of the onset of chest pain were randomized to receive either streptokinase (1.2 million U intravenously over 1 h) or immediate catheterization and direct coronary angioplasty. Patients were excluded for age > or = 75 years, prior bypass surgery, Q wave infarction in the region of ischemia or excessive risk of bleeding. All patients were then treated with aspirin (325 mg orally/day) and heparin (1,000 U intravenously/h) for 48 h until catheterization was performed to determine the primary study end point, namely, infarct-related artery patency at 48 h. Secondary end points were in-hospital death, left ventricular ejection fraction at 48 h and time to treatment. RESULTS. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups. Overall patient age was 56 +/- 10 years, 83% of patients were male, 11% had prior infarction, 40% had anterior infarction and 97% were in Killip class I or II. Although time to treatment was delayed in the angioplasty group (238 +/- 112 vs. 179 +/- 98 min, p = 0.005), there was no difference in 48-h infarct-related artery patency or left ventricular ejection fraction (patency 74% vs. 80%; ejection fraction 59 +/- 13% vs. 57 +/- 13%; angioplasty vs. streptokinase, p = NS for both). There were no major bleeding events, and the mortality rate with angioplasty (6%) and streptokinase (2%) did not differ (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS. These results suggest that intravenous thrombolytic therapy might be preferred over coronary angioplasty for most patients because of the often shorter time to treatment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Asseburg, Y. Bravo Vergel, S. Palmer, E. Fenwick, M. de Belder, K. R Abrams, and M. Sculpher Assessing the effectiveness of primary angioplasty compared with thrombolysis and its relationship to time delay: a Bayesian evidence synthesis Heart, October 1, 2007; 93(10): 1244 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Timmer, J. P. Ottervanger, M.-J. de Boer, E. Boersma, C. L. Grines, C. M. Westerhout, R. J. Simes, C. B. Granger, F. Zijlstra, and for the Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolys Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared With Fibrinolysis for Myocardial Infarction in Diabetes Mellitus: Results From the Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolysis-2 Trial Arch Intern Med, July 9, 2007; 167(13): 1353 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Hollenbeak, J. P. Fitzgibbons, M. Rossi, D. L. Morris, and P. Stillman The Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Outcomes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pennsylvania American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2007; 22(2): 85 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. H. Ting, E. H. Yang, and C. S. Rihal Narrative review: reperfusion strategies for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med, October 17, 2006; 145(8): 610 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Boersma and The Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs. Thrombolysis Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2006; 27(7): 779 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Huber, R. D. Caterina, S. D. Kristensen, F. W.A. Verheugt, G. Montalescot, L. B. Maestro, F. V. d. Werf, and for the Task Force on Pre-hospital Reperfusion The Pre-hospital reperfusion therapy: a strategy to improve therapeutic outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 2063 - 2074. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Writing Committee Members, E. M. Antman, D. T. Anbe, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, M. Hand, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, F. G. Kushner, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 671 - 719. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Antman, D. T. Anbe, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, M. Hand, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, F. G. Kushner, G. A. Lamas, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 588 - 636. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Willerson Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiologic Interventional Devices Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 561 - 580. [Full Text]

				F Zijlstra, A Patel, M Jones, C.L Grines, S Ellis, E Garcia, L Grinfeld, R.J Gibbons, E.E Ribeiro, F Ribichini, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early (<2h), intermediate (2-4h) and late (>4h) presentation treated by primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2002; 23(7): 550 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. HAMPTON Immediate angioplasty for the National Health Service? Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 241 - 242. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Zahn, R. Schiele, S. Schneider, A. K. Gitt, H. Wienbergen, K. Seidl, T. Voigtlander, M. Gottwik, G. Berg, E. Altmann, et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty?: Results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction registry and the myocardial infarction registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Le May, M. Labinaz, R. F. Davies, J.-F. Marquis, L. A. Laramee, E. R. O'Brien, W. L. Williams, R. S. Beanlands, G. Nichol, and L. A. Higginson Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 985 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Zahn, R. Schiele, S. Schneider, A. K. Gitt, H. Wienbergen, K. Seidl, C. Bossaller, H. J. Buttner, M. Gottwik, E. Altmann, et al. Decreasing hospital mortality between 1994 and 1998 in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty but not in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis: Results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) registry and the myocardial infarction registry (MIR) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2064 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Hannan, M. J. Racz, D. T. Arani, T. J. Ryan, G. Walford, and B. D. McCallister Short- and long-term mortality for patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1194 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Iqbal, H. Messmore, D. Hoppensteadt, J. Fareed, and W. Wehrmacher State-of-the-Art Review : Thrombolytic Drugs in Acute Myocardial Infarction Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 2000; 6(1): 1 - 13. [PDF]

				A. Brodison, R. S More, and A. Chauhan Stents in medicine: The role of coronary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 1999; 75(888): 591 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. K. Berger, K. A. Schulman, B. J. Gersh, S. Pirzada, J. A. Breall, A. E. Johnson, and N. R. Every Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolysis for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients JAMA, July 28, 1999; 282(4): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Gibson Primary Angioplasty Compared with Thrombolysis: New Issues in the Era of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition and Intracoronary Stenting Ann Intern Med, May 18, 1999; 130(10): 841 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Diaz, E. A. Paolasso, L. S. Piegas, C. D. Tajer, M. G. Moreno, R. Corvalan, J. E. Isea, and G. Romero Metabolic Modulation of Acute Myocardial Infarction : The ECLA Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Pilot Trial Circulation, November 24, 1998; 98(21): 2227 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ribichini, G. Steffenino, A. Dellavalle, V. Ferrero, A. Vado, M. Feola, and E. Uslenghi Comparison of thrombolytic therapy and primary coronary angioplasty with liberal stenting for inferior myocardial infarction with precordial ST-segment depression: Immediate and long-term results of a randomized study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1687 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coro A Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Coronary Angioplasty with Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., June 5, 1997; 336(23): 1621 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Zijlstra, J. C.A. Hoorntje, M.-J. de Boer, A. Magalski, J. H. O'Keefe, B. Leff, R. A. Lange, L. D. Hillis, and C. L. Grines Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction? N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 1997; 336(15): 1101 - 1103. [Full Text]

				N. R. Every, L. S. Parsons, M. Hlatky, J. S. Martin, W. D. Weaver, and The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention A Comparison of Thrombolytic Therapy with Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., October 24, 1996; 335(17): 1253 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Lange, L. D. Hillis, C. L. Grines, R. A. Lange, L. D. Hillis, and C. L. Grines Should Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty Be the Treatment of Choice for Acute Myocardial Infarction? N. Engl. J. Med., October 24, 1996; 335(17): 1311 - 1312. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Michels and S. Yusuf Does PTCA in Acute Myocardial Infarction Affect Mortality and Reinfarction Rates? : A Quantitative Overview (Meta-Analysis) of the Randomized Clinical Trials Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 476 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J McMurray and A Rankin Recent Advances: Cardiology - I: Treatment of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and angina pectoris BMJ, November 19, 1994; 309(6965): 1343 - 1350. [Full Text]