cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 22:80-84
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalbfleisch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalbfleisch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F

Association between atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia and inducible atrial flutter

SJ Kalbfleisch, R el-Atassi, H Calkins, JJ Langberg, and F Morady

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inducibility of atrial flutter in patients with atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia and to determine the effect of radio-frequency ablation of the slow AV node pathway on the inducibility of atrial flutter. BACKGROUND. Studies have shown that both AV node reentrant tachycardia and atrial flutter are reentrant arrhythmias having an area of slow conduction that is located in the low posterior right atrium near the ostium of the coronary sinus. METHODS. Ninety-one patients were prospectively evaluated using a standardized atrial pacing protocol. Three groups of patients were analyzed: 42 patients with inducible AV node reentrant tachycardia, 13 with a history of spontaneous atrial flutter and 36 control patients. A subgroup of 34 patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia who underwent successful radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV node pathway underwent atrial pacing again after ablation. RESULTS. Atrial flutter was more frequently inducible in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia (88%) and in those with a history of atrial flutter (92%) than in control patients (36%) (p = 0.0001). There were no differences between the patient groups with respect to atrial effective refractory period, P wave duration or PA interval at the His position. Among the 34 patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia who underwent atrial pacing before and after radiofrequency ablation, there were 30 with atrial flutter and 4 with atrial fibrillation before ablation and 29 with atrial flutter and 5 with atrial fibrillation after ablation (p = NS). There was no difference in the duration of the induced atrial flutter before and after ablation. The mean atrial flutter cycle length before ablation (206 +/- 22 ms) was not different from that after ablation (196 +/- 20 ms) (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS. There is a strong association between AV node reentrant tachycardia and inducible atrial flutter, suggesting that there may be a common area of perinodal atrium participating in the two tachycardia circuits. However, radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of the AV node reentrant tachycardia circuit does not influence the inducibility of atrial flutter.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. L. Waldo and G. K. Feld
Inter-Relationships of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 26, 2008; 51(8): 779 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.P. Kimman, D.A.M.J. Theuns, T. Szili-Torok, M.F. Scholten, J.C. Res, and L.J. Jordaens
CRAVT: a prospective, randomized study comparing transvenous cryothermal and radiofrequency ablation in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2004; 25(24): 2232 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Scharf, S. Veerareddy, M. Ozaydin, A. Chugh, B. Hall, P. Cheung, E. Good, F. Pelosi Jr, F. Morady, and H. Oral
Clinical significance of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 2057 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.P. Kimman, N.M. van Hemel, E.R. Jessurun, P.F.H.M. van Dessel, J.C. Kelder, J.J.A.M.T. Defauw, and G.M. Guiraudon
Comparison of late results of surgical or radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 1999; 20(7): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. M. Kalman, J. E. Olgin, L. A. Saxon, W. G. Fisher, R. J. Lee, and M. D. Lesh
Activation and Entrainment Mapping Defines the Tricuspid Annulus as the Anterior Barrier in Typical Atrial Flutter
Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 398 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. E. Olgin, J. M. Kalman, A. P. Fitzpatrick, and M. D. Lesh
Role of Right Atrial Endocardial Structures as Barriers to Conduction During Human Type I Atrial Flutter : Activation and Entrainment Mapping Guided by Intracardiac Echocardiography
Circulation, October 1, 1995; 92(7): 1839 - 1848.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Philippon, V. J. Plumb, A. E. Epstein, and G. N. Kay
The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Following Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter
Circulation, August 1, 1995; 92(3): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home