cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 22:168-174
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kligfield, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kligfield, P

Measurement variables for optimal performance of the ST integral

PM Okin, G Bergman, and P Kligfield

Department of Medicine, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York 10021.

OBJECTIVES. This study examined the effect of varied onset and offset of ST measurement on performance of the ST integral for the detection of coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND. The J point and other early ST segment measurements may significantly reduce the accuracy of ST segment depression criteria. METHODS. The exercise electrocardiograms (ECGs) from 112 normal subjects and 163 patients with known or likely coronary disease were analyzed, using the J point or 20 ms after the J point onset and 60 or 80 ms after the J point offset of ST integral calculation. RESULTS. At a matched specificity of 97%, incorporation of J point measurements into the ST integral significantly reduced test performance. The ST integrals measured from the J point to 80 and to 60 ms after the J point were significantly less sensitive (31% and 25%, respectively) than those measured from 20 to 80 ms and 20 to 60 ms after the J point (39% and 31%, p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). For either J point or 20 ms after the J point onset of the ST integral measurement, the sensitivity was higher using 80 ms than 60 ms after the J point offset (31% vs. 25%, p < 0.01 and 39% vs. 31%, respectively, p < 0.001). Comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves confirmed the superior performance of the ST integral measured from 20 to 80 ms after the J point relative to the other measurement intervals. CONCLUSIONS. These findings demonstrate that J point and early repolarization phase time-voltage measurements reduce performance of the ST integral for the identification of coronary artery disease and provide further evidence that optimal signal to noise content of repolarization for the identification of ischemia can be localized to later phases of the ST segment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Lauer, E. S. Froelicher, M. Williams, and P. Kligfield
Exercise Testing in Asymptomatic Adults: A Statement for Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention
Circulation, August 2, 2005; 112(5): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home