|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 22:119-126 © 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium.
OBJECTIVES. The present study was designed to investigate 1) the feasibility and accuracy of coronary pressure measurements with a novel 0.015-in. (0.038 cm) fluid-filled guide wire, and 2) the effect of the guide wire itself on stenosis hemodynamics. BACKGROUND. To assess the functional results of coronary angioplasty, measurements of the transstenotic pressure gradient have been advocated. However, this gradient is no longer routinely measured because it is not reliable when determined with the angioplasty catheter. METHODS. A fluid-filled 0.015-in. guide wire to be connected to a conventional pressure transducer was developed. Five wires were tested for their frequency response characteristics and for their accuracy in measuring hydrostatic pressure. In an in vitro model of stenosis (reference diameter 4 mm), the pressure gradient was determined at incremental flow levels for varying stenosis severity with and without a 0.015-in. guide wire through the narrowing. In 37 patients, the transstenotic pressure gradient was measured before and after angioplasty and compared with obstruction area and percent area stenosis as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS. The correlation between the actual pressure and the pressure recorded by the guide wire was excellent (r = 0.98) despite a slight underestimation (-3 +/- 5%). Phasic pressure recordings were precluded by a long time constant of 16 +/- 4 s. The presence of the guide wire produced a significant overestimation (> 20%) of the pressure decrease only in cases of tight stenosis (> 90% area reduction). Furthermore, a theoretic model based on the fluid dynamic equation predicted that this overestimation was inversely proportional to the reference diameter of the vessel, yet was only slightly influenced by the flow. The lesion was crossed in all but one patient (97%) and pressure gradient was recorded throughout the study in 34 (94%) of 36 patients. The mean pressure gradient decreased from 30 +/- 19 before to 3 +/- 5 mm Hg after angioplasty (p < 0.01). A curvilinear relation was found between the pressure gradient and both percent area stenosis (r2 = 0.67) and obstruction area (r2 = 0.72). A sharp increase in pressure gradient was noted once the stenosis exceeded 75% area reduction. CONCLUSIONS. Mean transstenotic pressure gradients can be easily and reliably recorded with a 0.015-in. fluid-filled guide wire. This ability should facilitate the functional assessment of coronary stenoses of intermediate severity and of immediate postangioplasty results.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Verberne, M. Meuwissen, S. A. J. Chamuleau, B.-J. Verhoeff, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, J. A. E. Spaan, J. J. Piek, and M. Siebes Effect of simultaneous intracoronary guidewires on the predictive accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2349 - H2355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Legalery, F. Schiele, M.-F. Seronde, N. Meneveau, H. Wei, K. Didier, M.-C. Blonde, F. Caulfield, and J.-P. Bassand One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2005; 26(24): 2623 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Roy, R. K. Banerjee, L. H. Back, M. R. Back, S. Khoury, and R. W. Millard Delineating the guide-wire flow obstruction effect in assessment of fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H392 - H397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Hau Fractional flow reserve and complex coronary pathologic conditions Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2004; 25(9): 723 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bupha-Intr and J. Wattanapermpool Cardioprotective effects of exercise training on myofilament calcium activation in ovariectomized rats J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1755 - 1760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. E. Hoffman Do we have agold standard yet? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 662 - 664. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Rathore, J. P. Curtis, Y. Wang, M. R. Bristow, and H. M. Krumholz Association of Serum Digoxin Concentration and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure JAMA, February 19, 2003; 289(7): 871 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Siebes, S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, and J. A. E. Spaan Influence of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): H1462 - H1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Brosh, S. T. Higano, M. J. Slepian, H. I. Miller, M. J. Kern, R. J. Lennon, D. R. Holmes Jr, and A. Lerman Pulse transmission coefficient: a novel nonhyperemic parameter for assessing the physiological significance of coronary artery stenoses J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2002; 39(6): 1012 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abe, H. Tomiyama, H. Yoshida, and N. Doba Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Moderate Coronary Artery Stenoses : Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2365 - 2370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. De Bruyne, N. H. J. Pijls, G. R. Heyndrickx, D. Hodeige, R. Kirkeeide, and K. L. Gould Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess Serial Epicardial Stenoses : Theoretical Basis and Animal Validation Circulation, April 18, 2000; 101(15): 1840 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kern Coronary Physiology Revisited : Practical Insights From the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.J Piek, E Boersma, C di Mario, E Schroeder, C Vrints, P Probst, B de Bruyne, C Hanet, E Fleck, M Haude, et al. Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2000; 21(6): 466 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jeremias, S. D. Filardo, R. J. Whitbourn, R. S. Kernoff, A. C. Yeung, P. J. Fitzgerald, and P. G. Yock Effects of Intravenous and Intracoronary Adenosine 5'-Triphosphate as Compared With Adenosine on Coronary Flow and Pressure Dynamics Circulation, January 25, 2000; 101(3): 318 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M POULLIS Coronary pressure measurements: catheter induced errors Heart, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 644a - 645. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bartunek, W. Wijns, G. R. Heyndrickx, and B. de Bruyne Effects of Dobutamine on Coronary Stenosis Physiology and Morphology : Comparison With Intracoronary Adenosine Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 243 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Abizaid, G. S. Mintz, R. Mehran, A. Abizaid, A. J. Lansky, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, H. Wu, C. Pappas, K. M. Kent, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Was Not Performed Based on Intravascular Ultrasound Findings : Importance of Lumen Dimensions Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 256 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Isobe, H. Takenaka, O. Kinoshita, M. Sekiguchi, M. Ohta, and H. Imamura Successful Stenting of Bilateral Renal Artery Stenosis Due to Fibromuscular Dysplasia Assessed by Use of Pressure Guidewire Technique: A Case Report Angiology, January 1, 1998; 49(1): 69 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. de Bruyne, J. Bartunek, S. U. Sys, N. H.J. Pijls, G. R. Heyndrickx, and W. Wijns Simultaneous Coronary Pressure and Flow Velocity Measurements in Humans: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Hemodynamic Dependence of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve, Hyperemic Flow Versus Pressure Slope Index, and Fractional Flow Reserve Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1842 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. H.J. Pijls, B. Van Gelder, P. Van der Voort, K. Peels, F. A.L.E. Bracke, H. J.R.M. Bonnier, and M. I.H. El Gamal Fractional Flow Reserve : A Useful Index to Evaluate the Influence of an Epicardial Coronary Stenosis on Myocardial Blood Flow Circulation, December 1, 1995; 92(11): 3183 - 3193. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. De Bruyne, J. Bartunek, S. U. Sys, and G. R. Heyndrickx Relation Between Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve Calculated From Coronary Pressure Measurements and Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemia Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 39 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |