A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of nadolol and verapamil in mild and moderately symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Division of Clinical Cardiology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.

OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to determine whether therapy with a beta-adrenergic or calcium channel blocking agent can improve the functional capacity and quality of life of patients with mild or moderately symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND. Both beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers may alleviate symptoms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but previous studies have been performed in hospitalized patients or have been open studies without control subjects. METHODS. A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of nadolol, verapamil and placebo, administered for periods of 4 weeks each, was performed in 18 patients with mild or moderately symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (10 men, 8 women; mean age +/- SD 39 +/- 17 years). A detailed symptom assessment, bicycle exercise testing, echocardiography and Holter monitoring were performed in each period. RESULTS. Two patients withdrew from the study owing to symptomatic sinus bradycardia during nadolol therapy. Neither drug improved maximal oxygen consumption (placebo 26 +/- 8, verapamil 23 +/- 6, nadolol 21 +/- 7 ml/kg per min; p = 0.1). Peak exercise work load was reduced by > or = 10 W in 13 patients (81%) during nadolol therapy and in 4 patients (25%) during verapamil therapy (p = 0.005, nadolol vs. verapamil). Despite the effects on exercise capacity, 13 patients (81%) preferred drug treatment (8 verapamil, 5 nadolol) over placebo (p = 0.001). Verapamil improved reported performance at work compared with nadolol (p = 0.01) and tended to improve other measures of health-related behavior and symptoms compared with nadolol and placebo. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with mild or moderately symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, exercise capacity was not improved by nadolol or verapamil, and individuals were more often impaired by nadolol than with verapamil. Nevertheless, many patients derived symptomatic benefit from drug therapy, especially with verapamil.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Fifer and G. J. Vlahakes Management of Symptoms in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 429 - 439. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bangalore, F. H. Messerli, J. B. Kostis, and C. J. Pepine Cardiovascular Protection Using Beta-Blockers: A Critical Review of the Evidence J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 14, 2007; 50(7): 563 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. S. Dhalla, M. R. Dent, P. S. Tappia, R. Sethi, J. Barta, and R. K. Goyal Subcellular Remodeling as a Viable Target for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2006; 11(1): 31 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Maron, W. J. McKenna, G. K. Danielson, L. J. Kappenberger, H. J. Kuhn, C. E. Seidman, P. M. Shah, W. H. Spencer III, P. Spirito, F. J. Ten Cate, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 5, 2003; 42(9): 1687 - 1713. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Writing Committee Members, B. J. Maron, W. J. McKenna, G. K. Danielson, L. J. Kappenberger, H. J. Kuhn, C. E. Seidman, P. M. Shah, W. H. Spencer III, P. Spirito, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2003; 24(21): 1965 - 1991. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Maron Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review JAMA, March 13, 2002; 287(10): 1308 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ryden and F. Gadler Pharmacological therapy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: what is the evidence for success? Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2001; 3(suppl_L): L21 - L25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Park, D. M. Gilligan, N. L. Bernardo, and O. Topaz Symptomatic Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: The Role of Dual-Chamber Pacing Angiology, February 1, 1999; 50(2): 87 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Shimada, M. Yoshiyama, K. Takeuchi, T. Omura, Y. Takemoto, S. Kim, H. Iwao, and J. Yoshikawa Long acting calcium antagonist amlodipine prevents left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 1998; 37(3): 618 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Spirito, C. E. Seidman, W. J. McKenna, and B. J. Maron The Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy N. Engl. J. Med., March 13, 1997; 336(11): 775 - 785. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Heric, B. W. Lytle, D. P. Miller, E. R. Rosenkranz, H. M. Lever, and D. M. Cosgrove Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy:Early and late results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1995; 110(1): 195 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text]