JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 21:1657-1660
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brogan, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brogan, W., 3rd
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, L.

Prognosis after valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and a low transvalvular pressure gradient

WC Brogan 3rd, PA Grayburn, RA Lange, and LD Hillis

Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

OBJECTIVES. This study was conducted to determine the risks and benefits of valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and a low transvalvular pressure gradient. BACKGROUND. There is uncertainty regarding the appropriate management of adults with severe aortic stenosis and a transvalvular pressure gradient < or = 30 mm Hg. With only six such patients reported, one study suggested that these subjects have a prohibitive operative risk and little symptomatic improvement if they survive surgical treatment, whereas another showed that they can survive an operation and improve symptomatically. METHODS. In an attempt to clarify the risks and benefits of valve replacement in these patients, we reviewed the records of 18 patients (15 men and 3 women, aged 49 to 81 years) with severe aortic stenosis (valve area < or = 0.4 cm2/m2 body surface area), a mean transvalvular pressure gradient < or = 30 mm Hg and limiting symptoms (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV) who underwent valve replacement. RESULTS. Six patients (33%) (95% confidence interval 13% to 59%) died perioperatively, whereas 10 patients (56%) (95% confidence interval 31% to 78%) improved symptomatically to functional class I (n = 8) or II (n = 2) (p = NS in comparison with the 6 who died). No clinical or hemodynamic variable was predictive of survival or improvement in functional class. CONCLUSIONS. Valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and a transvalvular pressure gradient < or = 30 mm Hg is accompanied by a considerable operative risk. Although there were no significant differences in this small series between the fraction of patients who died and those who exhibited improvement, we still recommend the procedure because many patients survive the operation and most of the survivors show an improved symptomatic status.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Levy, M. Laurent, J. L. Monin, J. M. Maillet, A. Pasquet, T. Le Tourneau, H. Petit-Eisenmann, M. Gori, Y. Jobic, F. Bauer, et al.
Aortic Valve Replacement for Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Long-Term Outcome: A European Multicenter Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1466 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, M. E.W. Kirsch, H. Petit-Eisenmann, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, D. Metz, C. Adams, J.-P. Quere, P. Gueret, et al.
Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2620 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Bergler-Klein, G. Mundigler, P. Pibarot, I. G. Burwash, J. G. Dumesnil, C. Blais, C. Fuchs, D. Mohty, R. S. Beanlands, Z. Hachicha, et al.
B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Relationship to Hemodynamics and Clinical Outcome: Results From the Multicenter Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) Study
Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2848 - 2855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Kulik, I. G. Burwash, V. Kapila, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel
Long-Term Outcomes After Valve Replacement for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-553 - I-558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis
Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1718 - 1720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Grayburn
Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Dobutamine
Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 604 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Chukwuemeka, V. Rao, S. Armstrong, J. Ivanov, and T. David
Aortic valve replacement: a safe and durable option in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 133 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B Vaquette, H Corbineau, M Laurent, B Lelong, T Langanay, C de Place, C Froger-Bompas, C Leclercq, C Daubert, and A Leguerrier
Valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular function: predictors of operative risk, left ventricular function recovery, and long term outcome
Heart, October 1, 2005; 91(10): 1324 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. C. Roberts and J. M. Ko
Relation of weights of operatively excised stenotic aortic valves to preoperative transvalvular peak systolic pressure gradients and to calculated aortic valve areas
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1847 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. P. Aurigemma and W. H. Gaasch
Low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis: The pathologist weighs in
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1856 - 1858.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. A. Carabello
Is it ever too late to operate on the patient with valvular heart disease?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.-L. Monin, J.-P. Quere, M. Monchi, H. Petit, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, C. Pop, P. Ohlmann, C. Lelguen, P. Dehant, et al.
Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long-Term Outcome: A Multicenter Study Using Dobutamine Stress Hemodynamics
Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 319 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Grayburn and E. J. Eichhorn
Dobutamine Challenge for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 763 - 765.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Nishimura, J. A. Grantham, H. M. Connolly, H. V. Schaff, S. T. Higano, and D. R. Holmes Jr
Low-Output, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function: The Clinical Utility of the Dobutamine Challenge in the Catheterization Laboratory
Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 809 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. J. Pereira, M. S. Lauer, M. Bashir, I. Afridi, E. H. Blackstone, W. J. Stewart, P. M. McCarthy, J. D. Thomas, and C. R. Asher
Survival after aortic valve replacement forsevere aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1356 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. A. Carabello
Ventricular function in aortic stenosis: how low can you go?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1364 - 1365.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. A. Carabello
Evaluation and Management of Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1746 - 1750.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. A. Carabello
Aortic Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., February 28, 2002; 346(9): 677 - 682.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, V. Gest, A.-M. Duval-Moulin, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Gueret
Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: Risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2101 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg
Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B J Bouma, J H P van der Meulen, R B A van den Brink, A E R Arnold, A Smidts, L H Teunter, K I Lie, and J G P Tijssen
Variability in treatment advice for elderly patients with aortic stenosis: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands
Heart, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 196 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. E. Powell, P. A. Tunick, B. P. Rosenzweig, R. S. Freedberg, E. S. Katz, R. M. Applebaum, J. L. Perez, and I. Kronzon
Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Arch Intern Med, May 8, 2000; 160(9): 1337 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. M. Connolly, J. K. Oh, H. V. Schaff, V. L. Roger, S. L. Osborn, D. O. Hodge, and A. J. Tajik
Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients
Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1940 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Collinson, M. Henein, M. Flather, J. R. Pepper, and D. G. Gibson
Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Poor Left Ventricular Function : Comparison of Early Changes With Stented and Stentless Valves
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. A. Carabello and F. A. Crawford
Valvular Heart Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., July 3, 1997; 337(1): 32 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.