Value of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, Holter monitoring and clinical variables for prediction of arrhythmic events in survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era

Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES. This study assessed the ability of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and Holter electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring and clinical variables to identify patients at risk of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. BACKGROUND. Most studies of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and Holter ECG monitoring in risk stratification after myocardial infarction preceded the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. METHODS. A consecutive series of 301 survivors of myocardial infarction, 205 (68%) of whom received thrombolytic agents, underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography (1st 48 h, day 6 and discharge), Holter ECG monitoring (days 6 to 7) and radionuclide left ventriculography (days 7 to 14). Median follow-up time was 1.03 years. RESULTS. Thirteen patients (4.3%) had an arrhythmic event (sudden death in 11, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in 2). The 25-Hz high pass filtered signal-averaged ECG at discharge was 64% sensitive (95% confidence intervals [CI] 36% to 92%) and 81% specific (95% CI 76% to 86%). High grade ventricular ectopic activity on the Holter ECG was only 38% sensitive (95% CI 12% to 64%) and 74% specific (95% CI 71% to 77%). Left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.4 was the best test for prediction of arrhythmic events (sensitivity 75% [95% CI 50% to 100%] and specificity 81% [95% CI 76% to 85%]). In multivariate analysis, in rank order, digoxin therapy at discharge, an abnormal 25-Hz signal-averaged ECG before discharge, absence of angina before index infarction and previous infarction were predictive of arrhythmic events. With digoxin therapy excluded, ejection fraction was an independent predictor. Discriminant analysis identified a high risk group (12% of the study patients) with an event rate of 26%. CONCLUSIONS. The signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular ejection fraction are each independently predictive of arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction, but the Holter ECG is not. A combination of clinical and investigative variables, including the signal-averaged ECG, best identifies patients at highest risk.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Goldberger, M. E. Cain, S. H. Hohnloser, A. H. Kadish, B. P. Knight, M. S. Lauer, B. J. Maron, R. L. Page, R. S. Passman, D. Siscovick, et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 25, 2008; (2008) j.jacc.2008.05.003v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Enseleit and F. Duru Long-term continuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 255 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care, Authors/Task Force Members, M. S. Nieminen, M. Bohm, M. R. Cowie, H. Drexler, G. S. Filippatos, G. Jondeau, Y. Hasin, J. Lopez-Sendon, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 384 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Huikuri, J. M. Tapanainen, K. Lindgren, P. Raatikainen, T. H. Makikallio, K. E. Juhani Airaksinen, and R. J. Myerburg Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 20, 2003; 42(4): 652 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Bailey, A. S. Berson, H. Handelsman, and M. Hodges Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1902 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Eisenberg Risk stratification for arrhythmic events: are the bangs worth the bucks? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1912 - 1915. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Huikuri, A. Castellanos, and R. J. Myerburg Sudden Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmias N. Engl. J. Med., November 15, 2001; 345(20): 1473 - 1482. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.G. Priori, E. Aliot, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, L. Bossaert, G. Breithardt, P. Brugada, A.J. Camm, R. Cappato, S.M. Cobbe, C. Di Mario, et al. Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1374 - 1450. [PDF]

				C. Schmitt, P. Barthel, G. Ndrepepa, J.u. Schreieck, A. Plewan, A. Schomig, and G. Schmidt Value of programmed ventricular stimulation for prophylactic internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in postinfarction patients preselected by noninvasive risk stratifiers J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1901 - 1907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Brembilla-Perrot, C. Suty-Selton, P. Houriez, O. Claudon, D. Beurrier, and A. T. de la Chaise Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Crawford, S. J. Bernstein, P. C. Deedwania, J. P. DiMarco, K. J. Ferrick, A. Garson Jr, L. A. Green, H. L. Greene, M. J. Silka, P. H. Stone, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography) developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 912 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Andresen, G. Steinbeck, T. Bruggemann, D. Muller, R. Haberl, S. Behrens, E. Hoffmann, K. Wegscheider, R.u. Dissmann, and H.-C. Ehlers Risk stratification following myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: a two-step strategy using noninvasive and invasive methods J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 131 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Waldecker, W. Waas, W. Haberbosch, R. Voss, H. Heizmann, and H. Tillmanns Long-term follow-up after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1320 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Savard, J.-L. Rouleau, J. Ferguson, N. Poitras, P. Morel, R. F. Davies, D. J. Stewart, M. Talajic, M. Gardner, R. Dupuis, et al. Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction Using Signal-Averaged Electrocardiographic Criteria Adjusted for Sex, Age, and Myocardial Infarction Location Circulation, July 1, 1997; 96(1): 202 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. L. Hubley-Kozey, L. B. Mitchell, M. J. Gardner, J. W. Warren, C. J. Penney, E. R. Smith, and B. M. Horacek Spatial Features in Body-Surface Potential Maps Can Identify Patients With a History of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, October 1, 1995; 92(7): 1825 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text]