Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in survivors of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death without inducible arrhythmias
BG Crandall,
CD Morris,
JE Cutler,
PJ Kudenchuk,
JL Peterson,
LB Liem,
DR Broudy,
HL Greene,
BD Halperin,
JH McAnulty,
et al.
Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.
OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in survivors of sudden cardiac death in whom no ventricular arrhythmias can be induced with programmed electrical stimulation. BACKGROUND. Survivors of sudden cardiac death in whom ventricular arrhythmias cannot be induced with programmed electrical stimulation remain at risk for recurrence of serious arrhythmias. Optimal protection to prevent sudden death in these patients is uncertain. This study compares survival in the subset of survivors of sudden cardiac death with that of patients treated with or without an ICD. METHODS. A retrospective study was performed on 194 consecutive survivors of primary sudden death who had < or = 6 beats of ventricular tachycardia induced with programmed electrical stimulation with at least three extrastimuli. Ninety-nine patients received an ICD and 95 did not. RESULTS. There were no significant differences between the two groups in presenting rhythm, number of prior myocardial infarctions or use of antiarrhythmic agents. Patients treated with an ICD were younger (55 +/- 16 vs. 59 +/- 11 years, p = 0.03) and had a lesser incidence of coronary artery disease (48% vs. 63%, p = 0.04) and a lower ejection fraction (0.43 +/- 0.16 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.18, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the groups in the use of revascularization procedures or antiarrhythmic agents after the sudden cardiac death. Patients treated with an ICD had an improvement in sudden cardiac death-free survival (p = 0.04) but the overall survival rate did not differ from that of the patients not so treated (p = 0.91). A multivariate regression analysis that adjusted for the observed differences between the groups did not alter these results. CONCLUSIONS. Survivors of sudden cardiac death in whom no arrhythmias could be induced with programmed electrical stimulation remained at risk for arrhythmia recurrence. Although the proportion of deaths attributed to arrhythmias was lower in the patients treated with an ICD, this therapy did not significantly improve overall survival.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
Committee Members, G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 6, 2002;
40(9):
1703 - 1719.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, M. J. Silka, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
Circulation,
October 15, 2002;
106(16):
2145 - 2161.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. V. Huikuri, A. Castellanos, and R. J. Myerburg
Sudden Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmias
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 15, 2001;
345(20):
1473 - 1482.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Grubman, B. B. Pavri, T. Shipman, N. Britton, and D. Z. Kocovic
Cardiac death and stored electrograms in patients with third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 1, 1998;
32(4):
1056 - 1062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
