JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 21:964-970
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waters, D
Right arrow Articles by Garceau, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waters, D
Right arrow Articles by Garceau, D

A dose-response study of clentiazem, a chloro-derivative of diltiazem, in patients with stable angina. CAMCAT Study Group

D Waters and D Garceau

Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Quebec, Canada.

OBJECTIVES. The efficacy and safety of clentiazem were assessed in 199 patients with stable angina in a dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel design study. BACKGROUND. To date, this is the first large efficacy and safety study of clentiazem in patients with stable angina. METHODS. After washout and a 1-week placebo run-in period, patients received 20, 40, 80 or 120 mg/day of clentiazem tablets or placebo as a twice-daily dosage for 1 week of treatment after 1 week of dose titration. A symptom-limited exercise tolerance test was performed 4 and 12 h after dosing at the end of treatment and results were compared with baseline measurements. RESULTS. At 4 h after dosing, improvement of exercise duration from baseline value was significantly greater with clentiazem at doses of 40 mg/day (63 +/- 11 s), 80 mg/day (99 +/- 10 s) and 120 mg/day (70 +/- 11 s) than with placebo (34 +/- 10 s). Moreover, clentiazem (80 and 120 mg/day) increased the time to onset of angina and to > or = 1 mm of ST segment depression significantly more than did placebo. At submaximal exercise, clentiazem (40, 80 and 120 mg/day) decreased rate-pressure product, mainly as a result of a decrease in heart rate. At 12 h after dosing, improvement of exercise duration from baseline was significantly greater with clentiazem in doses of 80 mg/day (77 +/- 9 s) and 120 mg/day (70 +/- 10 s) than with placebo (42 +/- 9 s). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events with placebo (27%) and clentiazem (29%) was similar. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events with clentiazem were asthenia, headache (both 7.9%), first-degree atrioventricular block and dizziness (both 4.4%). CONCLUSIONS. The results of this short-term study suggest that clentiazem given twice daily in doses of 80 or 120 mg/day is safe and effective monotherapy in the treatment of stable angina.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.